Yes, building ‘in world’ means building inside the platform of Decentraland. The Decentraland platform would include Genesis City or World servers.
You can download your scene from the World server or deploy to Genesis City.
So, yes, the first bullet is true - building inside the Decentraland platform.
As stated in the prior reply, this is functional inside Decentraland already. This is not a “LastSlice World” - anyone with a DCL name can build using the In World Builder toolset.
How is that seamlessly building in world then? If I can’t build in DCL genesis and only somewhere else to save/export and deploy … as far as I can tell that is not ‘in world’ building … I can’t change stuff on the go in DCL genesis as the first proposal would have people believe, only build else where and save and import?
@Zom I’ve built many scenes and used every building tool. Regardless of where you build a scene for Decentraland, it’s never in Genesis City. Whether you use SDK or the DCL Builder. It’s all done outside of Genesis and deployed to Genesis or Worlds.
IWB works exactly the same except you can build directly in the scene unlike the DCL builder or SDK. It’s literally in-world building which you can NOT do with the out of box SDK package or DCL Builder. It’s easier to understand if you demo it and try using it. I promise it’s a better experience than the available options.
I figure that was the main selling point here is having in Decentraland building … like we can change it in world as we’d want it on the go and with others. What is being said now is it only works in worlds that way, hench not fitting the function or that first bullet “Everything in world: Build inside Decentraland for Decentraland”
… more like build everything in World with export to the other parts of DCL.
You CAN build with others and you CAN build on the go. I’m not sure what you’re misinterpreting. If you try it out or watch any of the content on their twitter/youtube you can see it does exactly that. I was building with 3 people live the other day for several hours seamlessly. They could see what I was building live and I could see what they were building live. With our avatars. All inside Decentraland. Not on an external site, not on a different platform. All inside Decentraland. Again, you should try it out 
In Decentraland Genesis?
I guess that is what I’m saying is you can do this in DCL genesis. I have seen Lastraum demonstrate this in Angzaar on the go in DCL “genesis” building, not in Worlds … that was what I’d imagine to be able to do after the first grant.
I’m on my plot in Decentraland … I see no builder or tools …
Is there a special button I’m missing? … this is seamless building in Decentraland right?
In World Builder - No Code Game Creator
This proposal is now in status: PASSED.
Voting Results:
Dear Community,
The Grant Support Squad was created to support grantees in achieving their goals and managing the DAO treasury.
After a thorough review of this project, the Squad recommends the vesting contract starts 15th April and
Payout Strategy for Monthly on the 15st day.
Therefore, we recommend that the DAO Committee (@HPrivakos @Tobik @rizk) create the vesting contract with the following details:
Thank you so much.
FIFI
We cannot create the vesting contract earlier than it should, sorry.
Either the start date will be May 1st or May 15th but we cannot do April 15th as the proposal ended on April 2nd.
There needs to be better communication around this. Ultimately, this process needs to be improved for future grantees.
These grant systems seem to approach proposals with the mindset of individuals applying for grants. There also needs to be consideration around how to include future studios into this process.
We are a team and have approached our grant proposal(s) with countless hours of preparation, documentation, and design around each proposal. We are ready to hit the ground running once the voting period ends and the proposal passes. To do all the work on the front end to create a project concept, design, proposal (essentially business plan), and marketing and community calls and feedback, along with 2 week voting period, and then just have to wait for a month really stalls the project.
It really hinders development, especially in the platform category, to sit around and wait a minimum of 1 month - up to 1.5 months - before your vesting contract begins.
I will explain our case to hopefully shed light on areas of improvement within the grant system
Improvement suggestions
Again, we need to think about how to improve this process if we are trying to attract other development studios in the future. They will be sophisticated and ready to hit the ground running once voting is over. They won’t want to sit around and wait for a month for administrative purposes.
Hello @lastraum! How are you? Thank you for your message.
We have reviewed the process based on your case, so below we clarify everything so that you can be assured that everything was done correctly according to the current rules of the DAO:
The proposal that defines this issue of the dates of contracts and payments is this: where it explains the reason why the DAO Committee is acting in this manner. Their obligation is to enact the contracts based on the requested payment dates. We agree with you that it is something that can be improved given what is happening with you, but unfortunately, that is how it is today.
The GSS has an onboarding process that includes a prior analysis and communications with the grants. Here you can see it in the GSS manual. In your case, the analysis process was carried out and Fifi sent you the onboarding email where she explicitly explained the rule of dates (sic: Your Vesting Contract will be created by the DAO Committee after our onboarding meeting. Since your voting period ended on April 2nd and you choose to be paid on the first day of the month, the contract will start in May, and your first payment will be on the 1st of June.). This happened on April 9, 7 days after your grant passed. The GSS has a limit of 7 days to send that email (since it is the time when we do the prior analysis, etc) and it is true that yours was at the limit of the date, but honestly, this is the first time we have a problem with this.
Regarding the creation of contracts, we have a 15-day window in which the DAO Committee waits for us to create them, so that if we find irregularities in the project or the execution times do not coincide with the contract requested by the grantee, we can request some modification. This is what we tried to do with yours, but the truth is that clearly, we cannot make retroactive requests. We also agree with you that there is room for improvement to propose via governance - in line with what you say - that we can work to improve these types of cases.
I hope this clarifies this specific issue, apologies if any of this affected your work (I just wanted you to know that we were within the framework of the rules of our DAO) and thank you for bringing it up as it opens up space for improvements.
Regards!
Please DAO Committee (@HPrivakos @Tobik @rizk) create the vesting contract with the following details:
Thank you so much.
FIFI
In World Builder - No Code Game Creator
This proposal has been ENACTED by a DAO Committee Member (0x88013d7ed946dd8292268a6ff69165a97a89a639)
Vesting Contract Addresses: 0x2EfcbDea08eFE760DbC9D0E04a605C2e987F84D9
