[DAO:3dc17ce] End Dates and Exit Plans for DAO Proposals and Grant Requests

Governance
1

by 0x7bbea9c18cd0541acab8c19da2b11d0c03faef1c (1Existence)

Overview:
Should certain proposals, such as those involving DAO positions, include a specified end date to allow for a formal review or analysis of the value provided by the project or individual? This would ensure that ongoing efforts are evaluated for their effectiveness and relevance over time.

Additionally, should all grant requests be required to include a comprehensive exit plan? Inspired by @Canessadcl’s idea, this suggestion addresses the issue where grantees frequently return for additional funding to continue projects. This often puts the community in a difficult position—either allocate more funds to sustain an active project or allow it to stagnate in Genesis City, potentially becoming outdated and underutilized.

Objective:
This poll seeks community input on:

  1. Identifying which types of proposals should have mandated end dates for periodic review.
  2. Determining how best to phrase these requirements within the proposal applications.

Please note that this is an initial poll. There are two additional steps required for these suggestions to become formal policy.

Your insights and ideas are invaluable to refining this proposal.

Thank you,

1Existence

  • YES
  • NO
  • Invalid question/options

Vote on this proposal on the Decentraland DAO

View this proposal on Snapshot

1 Like
2

Voting YES because the problem is clear.

However, I think the best approach would be having units/squads ensuring the DAO can own and maintain the products.

That’s why I made those proposals:

1 Like
3

Would you like to work together and create the next step? Well on anything that doesn’t cost anything than someone deploying a build or delegating a parcel to someone.
Was hoping for ideas people had for whats next as well but will cross that bridge on the next step. I think the sandstorm builds could be deployed on some fairly soon. The selling or renting or giving of parcels will take more. I had mentioned in the past having a monthly wearable contest with the sentiment being that the winner gets the submission fee waived but maybe a parcel could be given away too. It was to be a 6 month testing and evaluate its benefits.

4

I guess we shall after the Regenesis. Sounds like finite terms and such was already discussed so until that comes through as a proposal I will hold off resubmitting this one since 1 person vs 10 is the only reason it did not pass.

5

The reason it didn’t pass was because threshold.

Sorry, I had to answer you quickly on Discord and I didn’t have the time to answer here.

The same topic among others was being covered simultaneously on Regenesis meeting.

6

It’s all good. Yes you are correct, it was a dismal turn out but I appreciate the yes votes.

1 Like