An experimental clickable browser you can put in your parcel is offered in this proposal.
It’s based on server image rendering and advanced caching.
It will be delivered as on-premise service with source code.
Will include instructions to install
Roadmap
Month 1 Delivery: At the end of the month the product is delivered.
I can paste my website URL and it creates a static snapshot of it? But it doesn’t refresh in real-time, does it refresh at all (every 24 hours or 1 week, etc). Or would I need to paste the URL and click process again for it to refresh new website content?
Nice observation @Ozymandias and I like that you gaged some kind of input and sentiment before writing this proposal. One thing I mentioned on the X post, would a person be able to enter login in information on a website? Response that was received was of security issues in doing so. I would vote yes on this if that can be done in a safe and secure environment. OnCyber has this capability, not sure on the security, but feel it would be a great idea and who knows what more could be done with this ability. Show videos, but then I guess that opens up the whole copyright and IP discussion. For now I have to go with abstain.
The main use case is to show web information, if you own a parcel you set the home page of whatever you want to let visitors navigate through it.
examples:
Show the web of your brand in your parcel.
Perform a classroom.
etc.
I think those use cases are good enough. I don’t think it’s really useful to navigate the web privately in a metaverse.
no videos and no login are in this proposal, it’s to cover the main aspect I mentioned as today there is no way to do it. The only alternative would be to mimic the web you want to show with SDK screens which requires effort for each specific case.
I voted Yes on this already. I think this one is asking for an additional $1. As long as you go back in time and use the $1 to buy a McChicken back when it used to be on the Dollar Menu. I am down.
This can not be a smart item because it needs a server
Now that you mention… could be true what you say, I’d need to review.
Content shown can be either private per user or public/shown to others
Public
Multiple users can click at the same time or there can be a moderator who has click rights
My idea was to lock the screen for little time when a player is handling it.
FPS and resolution depends on scene developer
I think talking about fps here doesn’t make so much sense, the time to update the screen I estimate that will be bellow a second most of the time. like downloading a 1024x768 png image. Cache mechanisms can be applied also to client, so returning to a previous page could be instant.
I like the idea and I think that we definetely need this function but I see less priority in this.
It’s a little first experimental MVP covering the lack of a really useful feature.
How long are you going to maintain the server?
Or are you going to shut it down as soon as the grant is done like InJesterr did and like you just did with GolfCraft?
He said it would be an “on-premises” solution. Meaning he’s expecting people to run this on their own server. I personally have absolutely no interest in ever using this, I think the user experience of browsing a 2D screen skewed in a 3D world within another 2D screen sounds pretty lackluster.
