Honestly some sus stuff going on, im no wallet stalker lol but if that 4.4M vote is who i think it is, then that is very concerning considering this proposal is completely invalid under DCL terms.
very curious on the outcome of this prop.
4 Likes
hey @esteban, would love to hear your reasoning behind your vote if youâre happy to discuss.
3 Likes
Excellent point. Can we please look in to whose wallet that 4.4M votes come from?
3 Likes
If someone thinks that the DCLDAO is the actual DCL DAO then they should probably do some research 
I actually think itâs an interesting talking pointâŚ
IMHO; banning is a bit extreme hereâŚ
6 Likes
The thing is, as much as we have intelligent people, we also have the same amount of the opposite in DCL. Sometimes people really believe I am BobMarley when this name is assigned to my avatar. Even tough he died 40+ years ago. Drugs & Alcohol may be a contributing factor, who knows. This factor should not be a reason to ban any names. TBH I canât even believe weâre having this argument. If this name does get banned, I would have lost respect to everyone that voted YES.
4 Likes
I never voted Yes on a name ban proposal, I donât think any name should be banned, feel free to check the banned names listed above and you will see I donât appear in those lists.
I simply clicked the wrong button then corrected it when I was made aware.
cc: @mazafaka
You can also present you as DAO Committee member and start a proposal to release me of my duty if thatâs your wish. You can put your presentation over there: Open Call - New DAO Committee Member
2 Likes
He had the opportunityâŚbut its too late now
1 Like
so I do think this does fall under 2.4 âcontent that is⌠misleadingâŚâ however my consensus is a verified mark would be the ideal solution. I will be submitting a proposal for this after the holidays if you would like to cosign it when its ready @nwiz or @szjanko
GM 
Happy Thanksgiving 
1 Like
Banning Names that are completely valid is censorship.
5 Likes
@MetaTrekkers, has your position on this issue changed?
3 Likes
Ban the name DCLDAO
This proposal is now in status: REJECTED.
Voting Results:
- Yes 42% 5,947,146 VP (38 votes)
- No 58% 7,966,218 VP (84 votes)
3 Likes
Hi @nwiz, Happy Thanksgiving. We actually had this discussion after the town hall meeting two days ago. Interesting points were made. I share the same views as szjanko, no need to ban it but maybe make some official names with blue check marks etc. I donât want to ban anything, just wants new comers to be able to distinguish the official employees of the committee from regular individuals when voting or they will be confused.
We dont share the same views⌠I dont know why you are using my name here? You voted to ban the name on this proposal and I 100% disagree with that decision.
4 Likes
Oh sorry, I guess what I mean is I like the â Blue check mark idea you proposed. â
this is a contradiction to your vote, ser. 
4 Likes
They made a nice OTC DealâŚWell done @nwiz
5 Likes
I think in the future, we should just do a poll first instead of an actual proposal immediately. There is only a Yes or No option. We should have different options for different results. Anyway the proposal didnât pass and the name was traded to someone in the foundation. So it seems like a win-win situation for everyone. Take care and have a great day.