Is there a passed governance proposal or just a poll and draft?
@Fehz suggesting you do this does not invalidate HPâs claim that the foundation wonât approve the pull request, so going on to ALL CAPS about reading the 6 sentences seems childish.
Anyway, good luck. Would be cool to have more slots.
THIS IS THE FINAL RESPONSE TO ALL CONTINUE TO ASK QUESTIONS THAT ARE ADDRESSED IN THE 6 SENTENCE PROPOSAL. To you fake puppet account and anyone else that continues to prove they did not read the proposal asking questions that are addressed IN the SIX SENTENCE PROPOSAL will NO LONGER GET A RESPONSE FROM ME.
I know you are probably going through lot in your real life to devot so much time to ask so many illerlavant false questions with ill intent, one can only deduce to bring people down to your level It is sad because now the small group we have left has continued tocall you out for this as well and you continue to try to do it to us all knowing we arleady know and one can also deduce it is at this point a cry for help.
All I can say is I hope things do get better for you one day and it is ok try evolve. You will be forgiven and met with open arms when you want to instead devote your life to trying to be productive for a chance like you use to be. Thank you. And goodbye for now. Till then.
Oh, this is trolling. Got it.
If you arenât a troll, you certainly arenât a diplomat.
Being unable to receive feedback or answer simple questions is not a good way to go about getting your ideas implemented.
Setnence 1
You then link to a Poll and Draft⌠The DCL dao governance goes Poll->Draft->Binding Governance Proposal. is it not reasonable to ask if you have actually passed a governance proposal?
Sentence 2
I Aaron Leupp have offered to work for Free and implement them myself however have been advised by @fehz via DCL DAO discord chat to instead put this through this method bid and tender to allow someone to get compensated for the work.
Is it unreasonable to point out that just because Fehz suggested the idea, it doesnât mean that the foundation has to respect it?
Sentence 3
Also this round is just to make the beta slots of Aaron Leuppâs items (Waifumon Gen-2, Decentraland Dinos, âArmory Working Titleâ BAYC, ApeCoin, MYAC, CryptoPunks, and other Aaron Leupps wearables etc) etc and PunkPink and Old Guys items.
This sentence does not appear to address the issues with the foundation implementing the idea
Sentence 4
Later after launch and some time a 2nd round can be developed for these slots to also be open to the public since that as said by the foundation âa bit more complex as we want to have a more complex systemâ at that point in time before opening these slots to the public for submissions outside of AaronLeupp, PunkPink and Oldguys wearables.
The sentences for target audience and relevant now also donât appear to address the issues raised.
Now please stop being a petulant child. Thanks.
That has always been his strategy, just check his previous proposals, each time we question any thing that doesnât make sense in his proposals he just says âReReAd ThE PrOpOsAl â
I just jumped into this conversation because Iâve never been called a bucket-crabâŚ
This has become the troll thread
Hey there!
Just to clarify:
I suggested incorporating feature requests, such as the one for Pet Slots, into Canny for further evaluation of their feasibility by the Foundation. Once determined the feasibility, if the request is not prioritized, we can proceed to create a tender proposal.
Iâd leave this Pitch Proposal as it is, it doesnât harm anyone and itâs one step ahead. After assessing the viability of the feature and its implementation (what HP is mentioned), we could take the next steps and present a tender.
For every single feature that could potentially be developed by the DAO and added to the platform coordinating with the Foundation is essential.
Thanks @Fehz for clarification and helping however you can with this process!
Hi @AaronLeupp I am so glad that you submitted this through Canny. There has been some conversation around this type of request and the three-step governance process and whether that is needed or not. I submitted this poll: Add search bar to find emotes (decentraland.org) and once it passed, I also put it through Decentraland Feedback (canny.io) and received very quickly an update to the request. I decided not to move forward with the governance process because I realized it should go through Canny because (as I understand) itâs a Foundation update and not something the DAO controls. I hope you start to see traction and look forward to wearing my pets
3 New Slots Beta (Air Pet, Land Pet, Extra) Implementation
This proposal is now in status: PASSED.
Voting Results:
- Yes 86% 5,608,854 VP (42 votes)
- No 14% 919,522 VP (10 votes)
- Abstain 0% 0 VP (0 votes)