As I’ve stated on other Worlds-related proposals, I believe that there are bigger issues to address first with Worlds before considering changing its name. Worlds should be fully flushed out with all its features and integrations before a name change should even be evaluated. It’s only been live for 6 months. Most name changes don’t happen until a year or so after for data purposes.
The way the GitHub commit expresses it is that the reason for the change is because the name is “confusing.” Which isn’t enough to strong-arm a rebrand so early. I don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone saying they’re confused as to what it is from the public or the community. Would like to see more evidence/data behind this proposition.
Also isn’t there a Formal Request process now that we can inquire about this through? @Matimio