by 0x41eb5f82af60873b3c14fedb898a1712f5c35366 (theankou)
I believe that canny requests and suggestions from users which were approved and implemented should reward users with MANA / VP. This will speed up process and motivate active users to leave feedback and good suggestions for best future of Decentraland.
Hello,
Canny is request for the foundation so who would pay the Mana?
If we are doing this with Canny, we should be doing this with legislation in the DAO first imo.
Rewards/incentives could be badges instead of VP.
Appreciate this proposals intent comes from a good place. It may even be beneficial. However I do not think Canny has resulted in anything. I could be wrong but almost all canny requests have all been responded with “we may get to it at a later date.” Almost every canny request I have put it has had delayed responses week or more apart. I don’t think they have the bandwith to take on our small community of a dozen members putting in requests let alone if we start incentivizing a bigger community to make more requests will continue to make a black hole of never ending requests that wont get responses. I wont vote since I need to know more but just wanted to share this feedback in case helps. Thanks.
I have some completed canny requests. Well, even if that will be a blackhole, at least people will be motivated to leave bug reports with believe in future rewards. Also @Fehz I dont believe that badge is good reward. Instead some amount of MANA would be good.
Also, I believe as more bug reports and suggestions canny receive, the faster developers will decide roadmap and path for future updates. Even if most of reports will be ignored.
Btw, why we should do suggestions and bug reports for free, if thats a developers fault?
I just went through all 89 requests and not one have been marked as completed. What requests are you talking about that have been “completed”. I could be wrong some are marked as “in progress” but not one has been marked as “complete” @theankou
Hey Aaron,
As an example, I went to the Marketplace tab and selected “complete”. I was able to find quite a few that have been complete:
Marketplace | Decentraland (canny.io)
Thanks @DedHeadJ ! So 6 complete and 89 uncompleted. so 6 out of 95 are completed. So yes def way behind already as I was saying. Still don’t see any of the completed requests put in by @theankou .
Nope, I only used one category as an example. If you go to the Canny Link above and select a category, complete then you will find many others that have been marked as complete. Hope this helps Aaron 
Thank you @DedHeadJ ! Yes so that is def better I count now 25 complete and 89 not completed. 25 out of 114 I guess not to bad as thought thank you even tho majority not complete. Also I only saw 1 completed request that was submitted by @theankou . Is more I am missing since you said
? Thank you !
Reward Canny Requests
This proposal is now in status: FINISHED.
Voting Results:
Reward Canny Requests
This proposal has been PASSED by a DAO Committee Member (0xfb1afa4dc069ffb47b19dbee196045d508fcd5a2)
Canny has a high barrier of implementation as the ideas have to be both solid and approved/implemented by DAO/foundation.
This is a perfect process for enabling VP to users who are contributing solid ideas to the platform, I don’t know if mana would be a good idea as we may cause more spam, and people arguing they came up with an idea first to be paid, but VP should be appreciated by those who wish to improve the platform and deserve a voice.
@AaronLeupp, this how I feel about Foundations/@yemel 's claim that we will listen to user feedback … or, no, user feedback is their top priority, lol. I don’t know Canny.io stats for DCL atm, but my point is that they only have to entertain a few ideas out of many to say they fulfilled listening to user feedback.
Just pick the ideas that have some upvotes (ie listening to ppl) that aligns with what Foundation already wants to do and you have the achieved giving user feedback top priority.
If they really wanted a “better” DCL they wouldn’t have thrown out all the ideas that have been voted on and approved by this DAO (aka the community feedback was to go through a lengthy DAO process to make it happen in game) with the making of DCL Client 2.0 If Foundation wanted to honor user feedback, they have years worth of approved/supported game changes here that they aren’t listening to with DCL client 2.0
I had a conversation with @meshroom … he summed it up “We are listening to feedback, just not yours.” This is basically all they have to do is listen and reenforce the ideas they want through a few up votes on Canny.io … the DAO seems dead as far as I can tell, until Foundation wants to start honoring DAO voted on changes that still are not implemented in DCL Client 2.0
You may think you are getting some where with Canny, but really its just a tool for Foundation to do what they want under the facade of listening to users, lol.
(somehow, I ended up on this old post, lol)
Haha the ironic thing @zom about this that was 1 year ago and all those issues still have not been solved and I been doing my best to work with them for 3 years now to do it. And not one week has gone by where I have not worked on it with them best I can doing new round ever changing instructions. All this could have been solved all these years ago by me simply sending a google drive url and giving me access to fix . I even offered to do all fixes for free. But of course every time I explain this to someone that asks here in the DAO it gets censored and deleted. So take screenshot of my response before it also gets taken down . You legit said it’s so dead here in the dao now well this could be it lol
Not a good idea to hand out VP on a platform (canny) where only few individuals participate.
VP has to be earned by investing in DCL assets. Land, Mana, L1 Skins, Names.
If you want to have a voice ( in terms of vp) one must become a stakeholder.
Badges would be more effective & efficient.
