by 0x4fee6e3f77767046780237a23dd55ffec03502ca (Wix)
Stake Decentraland, Land, L1 Wearables & Names for Mana Rewards. Mana to be paid from in conjunction with DAO & Foundation’s treasury.
Duration: Staking period is 30 days minimum. All rewards to be paid after 30 days. If the NFT is withdrawn within that 30 days, staker will not be compensated.
Land Staking Rewards: 5 Mana Per Land, Per Month
Name Staking Rewards: 0.5 Mana Per Name, Per Month
L1 Wearables Staking Rewards Per Month:
Mythic: 5 Mana
Legendary: 0.5 Mana
Epic: 0.05 Mana
Rare: 0.001 Mana
Uncommon: 0.005 Mana
This is an initiative to help boost the market & bring awareness to DCL NFT’s. It was an idea I had for a while but didn’t know how or when to do it. Now that we are in the bear market & there is little to no marketplace activity in the aforementioned nft classes, I figured this would be a good time. Staking feature to be implemented in Decentraland’s Marketplace. Please share your thoughts.
- Invalid question/options
Vote on this proposal on the Decentraland DAO
View this proposal on Snapshot
Please note: Above reward figures are to be used as an indication only and these are subject to change (adjusted) according to community consensus.
I would like to know more. Would the land, names and L1 wearables still be useable during that time period? Im interested to see how this might evolve.
Excellent question. There are two different approaches. One is, all staked NFT’s can still be used while being staked. Other is NFT’s can not be used during the staking period at all. There are positives & negatives in both cases. One positive for the latter is less available supply on the marketplace if most or many NFTs are staked leading to higher prices. Negative out of this scenario is higher prices may result in increased entry point for new users.
I guess with the first option NFT’s can still be used while being staked. They should forfeit all staked rewards if sold within that staking period maybe. Not referring to loosing all previously earned rewards, if it makes sense.
I mean a better model would be to come up with another token like sMana with limited supply, which will only be used for the staking rewards. I don’t know if this is possible to do or not. So for now we stick to Mana
I think the selling part is a definite. If sold or put on the market it cannot be staked. Many names don’t get used so for most staking them is not a problem. Maybe the same with some L1 wearables. The land part however, if not able to be used, is not ideal IMO as we want people to build on their parcel if at all possible.
Good point. Makes perfect sense. I hope this can evolve into something much bigger.
Have you done the math for what it will cost both the DAO and Foundation on a monthly basis? That will give everyone a clear understanding on the financial undertaking that this proposal will cost.
480k MANA per month (a fifth of what we get from the vesting contract) with LANDs and Names alone, for absolutely no benefit at all.
Huge waste of money.
Same could be said for 90% of all the grant proposals.
Let’s see what the others have to say about this too.
Based on these numbers if every single NFT were to be staked, we be looking at about 500K Mana per month. At current mana price about 150K per month.
500K x 0.29 = 145K USD (a bit more than 15k a month…)
I like the idea of staking but it isn’t sustainable considering the capital outlay, even if we split if halfway with the foundation.
Perhaps a different kind of staking reward like VP for MANA, Lands and NAMEs will be good. Once unstaked, the corresponding accumulated VP is also revoked.
Or do you mean staking rewards to be paid in VP’s. This is a option worth looking into.
I have another staking proposal and this one makes sure DAO & Foundation’s funds are intact so they can distribute it more charities.
Along with the VP 1ex mentioned, perhaps adding loyalty point system (prob need some wordsmithing for a better name) that can be redeemed in some sort of rewards system may be beneficial. The reward system can vary and be used to redeem raffle tickets, VP, parcel giveaways, etc.
Yes, lets taunt the SEC, can’t see any way for this to go poorly
If the SEC hasn’t come in yet for all the grant charity fundings, there is little to no chance they will ever come now.
Do you know what “SEC” stands for? Your reply suggests no.
I don’t believe anyone knows what the “SEC” stands for besides yourself, but let me check what is says in the birdieleaks
Stake Decentraland NFT’s for Mana Rewards
This proposal is now in status: FINISHED.
- Yes 1% 7,084 VP (45 votes)
- No 99% 4,504,257 VP (46 votes)
- Invalid question/options 0% 0 VP (0 votes)