dao
January 11, 2022, 9:05am
1
by 0x3611e64432fc741d094243457ad2a904e7ede8ab
I can’t see any governance vote for this partnership with the Australian Open:
https://twitter.com/AOmetaverse
However the Australian Open believes they have a formal partnership with Decentraland organised by someone representing themselves as the Head Of Partnerships:
https://au.linkedin.com/in/adecata
There are two options here, either Adam is an employee of Decentraland in which case his private company RunItWild is profiting from the NFT project he organised OR he is not and the Australian Open was deceived.
Employees can profit from side hustles
Employees must run everything past the DAO
Adam is not an employee, AO was deceived
Invalid question/options
Vote on this proposal on the Decentraland DAO
View this proposal on Snapshot
Could you explain what you mean by:
his private company RunItWild is profiting from the NFT project
Do you have some more information/insight about what would his private deal be?
I voted “Invalid question/options”, because it misses the option I would have voted:
"Decentraland Foundation employees can continue bringing cool partnerships like this one, and if they screw up we should fire them"
edit: replaced “Decentraland” with “Decentraland Foundation”
dao
January 11, 2022, 9:05am
3
Should employees of Decentraland be allowed to form partnerships and profit without DAO approval?
This proposal is now in status: REJECTED.
Voting Results:
Employees can profit from side hustles 0% 0 VP (1 votes)
Employees must run everything past the dao 27% 189,441 VP (7 votes)
Adam is not an employee, ao was deceived 0% 0 VP (1 votes)
Invalid question/options 73% 511,245 VP (15 votes)