[DAO: QmbruLb] Restructuring Wearables Submission Fees

by 0xd11a019a70986bd607cbc1c1f9ae221c78581f49 (Yemel)

Linked Draft Proposal

Restructuring Wearables Submission Fees


Set the wearable submission to $150 USD worth of MANA and set the curators compensation to $50 USD per item reviewed.


This proposal aims to align the DCL community about how the wearable submission fee should be structured. The proposal gives more context about the history, motivations and economics of the fee and also proposes a new scheme.


The Wearables Marketplace was originally launched on June 1st 2021 , with the goal of empowering a creators economy by giving users a wide variety of choices to express themselves and giving creators the tools to monetize their work.

Every creator that submits a new wearable to the marketplace is asked to pay a fee in MANA (Wearable Submission Fee). This fee is necessary to:

  • Cover the compensation of the curator that will review the submission to ensure technical soundness and protect against IP infringements.

  • Limit the cost of perpetually hosting the wearable in the Catalyst Decentralized Network.

  • Foster the continual growth of Decentraland platform and its community via giving those fees to the DAO and funding the Community Grants program.

The wearable submission fee was originally set to 500 MANA, with a MANA price of ~0.8 USD. However when the MANA price reached the $2 USD mark the community raised their concerns via a proposal to automatically adjust the fee to a fixed amount of 500 USD payable in MANA was voted.

The proposal noted that pegging the publication fee to USD was healthy for the creators’ economy. It allows the creators to better budget their projects and market their services without exposing them to the fluctuation of the MANA price.

The proposal was raised to the Security Advisory Board and decided to lower the wearable submission fee one-time to 100 MANA as a temporary measure in the waiting for an automated solution. This change was announced in the DAO Committee Report #12 .

Since then, the price of MANA has come down to the $1 USD mark and the current fee seems too low. The curator committee is getting 10 MANA per item review and it doesn’t seem up to the responsibility of the role. At the same time, going back to a 500 USD fee is shocking for new creators in the Decetraland community.

This proposal aims to restructure the current wearable submission fee to a more sustainable framework. The goal is to keep the fee at minimum while still covering the expenses for the marketplace to work.


Below is the specification of how the Wearable Submission Fee should be structured:

  • The fee amount should be set at a fixed USD price, but paid in MANA.

  • The fee should cover the work of a curator to review the submission.

  • The fee should support the catalyst network.

  • The fee should support the DAO to continue investing in Grants.

The first item has been addressed by the Decentraland Foundation team by creating a new version of the marketplace smart contracts that uses a Chainlink oracle to get the current MANA price. This way the fee is paid in MANA but the amount is set in USD.

Regarding the compensation of the curator for each review, a price of $50 USD per item reviewed seems fair. The curation might take between 30 minutes and several hours depending on the feedback cycles with creators.

The catalyst network is currently formed by 11 servers that hosts all the content of Decentraland’s world, including wearable 3d models, scene content and avatar selections. Half of the Catalyst servers are runned by Decentraland Foundation and the rest by individual community members.

The cost of hosting a Catalyst server is ~600 USD per month. The total annual cost to run the 11 servers is ~$80,000 USD. At this moment this cost is paid by catalyst owners and is not subsidized by the DAO, but it totally should, and part of the Wearable Submission Fee should be allocated to subsidize catalyst owners.

In the past year 5,530 wearables have been submitted to the marketplace, so if we maintain this publication rate, a fee of 15 USD per wearable should be enough to account for catalyst expenses for a year.

And finally, the DAO should get a fee to continue investing in the Grants Program, fostering the development and growth of the platform. A contribution between 50 and 100 USD should be allocated for this purpose.

Wearable Submission Fee = 150 USD

  • 33% = 50 USD go to the curator
  • 10% = 15 USD to supporting catalyst servers
  • 57% = 85 USD goig to the DAO to support the Grant’s Program.


This proposal will be beneficial to creators by derisking how they budget projects and promote their services, removing the volatility of MANA from the equation.

The proposed value of $150 USD per submitted wearable should be attractive to many talented creators while still preventing spam and supporting the underlying cost of running a wearables marketplace.

A potential risk is to incentivize the submissions of low-quality wearables, making the curation process longer and rising the cost of running a catalyst. This could be mitigated by implementing more automation over the process curation process and/or raising the price in the future with a new governance process.

Implementation Pathways

Decentraland Foundation with the help of the Security Advisory Board will deploy the update of the marketplace’s smart contracts to set the wearable submission to $150 USD payable in MANA.

The DAO Committee will issue payments to curators on monthly basis at a new rate of $50 USD per curation. The DAO Committee will propose a mechanism to distribute compensation to catalyst owners over time.


This proposal aims to set the wearable submission fee to a USD value in order to better support the creators economy, derisking them from market volatility, enabling to budget projects and market their services at a expectable rate.

Economics considerations have been made to ensure that a fee of 150 USD can cover the compensation of the curators, a subsidy to the catalyst network and keep reinvesting in the growth of the platform.

Vote on this proposal on the Decentraland DAO

View this proposal on Snapshot

First of all I want to thank the Foundation for hearing the concerns and needs of the creator community and acting rapidly to rework the previously approved Governance proposal. Thank you also for not enforcing the standard 3 step process of approval to take action. I truly believe this prevented many of our most talented designers and creators from abandoning the space.

Second, as one of the largest private investors of layer 2 wearables currently in the ecosystem, I appreciate the fact that you have taken into consideration the costs associated with perpetually hosting my precious and beloved assets. I would be devastated to log in one day to learn that I can no longer wear my items because of a lack of funding due to poor planning and increased expenses. Or even worse, see DCL disappear altogether.

Finally, I want to thank you for considering the compensation of our curators whose job can be extremely difficult at times. Dealing with inexperienced contributors who may not be as savvy with blender or the terminology associated with 3D modeling can be time consuming and most likely frustrating at times. I’ve never once seen a single curator lose their temper or express anything other than the utmost professionalism when dealing with these and other sensitive topics. (Including but not limited to changes in the allowed types of wearables being published) In every aspect of their job, they are protecting the integrity of the wearables marketplace and our community. They deserve to be compensated at a rate that is equal to their hard work and dedication.

I will personally reach out to my friends and community members in general and try to rally the masses together to get this restructured proposal passed as I feel you have reached a perfect common ground that is both fair and appropriate for everyone involved. The only regret I have is that I don’t have more VP to personally make a difference.

Thank you @yemel, the foundation, and anyone else involved for this fantastic proposal. And to those of you in the community who read this comment, I urge you to vote yes. At the risk of sounding dramatic, the future of our wearables market and perhaps our entire virtual world may depend on unity on issues such as this. Bravo team.


Restructuring Wearables Submission Fees

This proposal is now in status: PASSED.

Voting Results:

  • Yes 92% 7,464,211 VP (46 votes)
  • No 8% 680,526 VP (4 votes)

Restructuring Wearables Submission Fees

This proposal has been ENACTED by a DAO Committee Member (0xfe91c0c482e09600f2d1dbca10fd705bc6de60bc)