Maybe Sugar Club was offended however I am not going to cuddle someone who might be offended every time they might be offended. I would imagine that Sugar Club who has been around since the beginning has much thicker skin than someone’s opinion around whether their club should remain a specific POI. Even they seem to agree that they may qualify for a different POI.
SugarClub doesn’t get to make up rules and act like a victim. as someone who has personally been victim to sugars victim mentality, I have no sympathy for there desire to abandon dcl and pretend they deserve special treatment.
your desire to stir up shit and try and make cheddar a bad guy is frankly absurd and beyond foolish.
1 Like
Obviously i dont know the full SC situation well enough that I can justify abusing people online aswell 
I just remember SC as one of the first builds… When people didnt need to build for any reason… Before any toxicity and expectations of money… I just came here to try and kill the toxicity with love and simplicity… Im not the one calling names to anyone…
The name calling is the reason that the OGs have left this place… So whats the point in doing it? SC shouldnt need to have “thicker skin” just for being here… Or be called “foolish”…
Guyz this is a Governance thread ! Can you not bring your bickering out to the schoolyard ?
Why aren’t we concentrating on @Canessa’s suggestion, and working on Escalating this here Draft, which would make Legacy POIs an actual thing ?
Please leave me alone. I’ve never done anything to you, and you insist on creating a false narrative around some imagined slight.
You: no need to keep talking about this
You seconds later: actually….
Maybe you confuse me with Tudamoon, the person who harassed you for months on end 
1 Like
Hey @Sceth
First, I want to thank you for this post, and I want to recognize the amazing work you have done in Decentraland. No one can deny that Sugar Club was not only a great hangout, but also continues to be a beautiful work of art. I don’t want it to go away, and I think it is a loss to not have you around. I prefer that you are a part of our world, and that SC remains an option for us to go play, listen to music, chat and make memories. I disagree that we should notify before submitting a proposal, but I think it’s a reasonable request, and it would not be a burden when making a POI change. From now on, if I submit a POI removal, I will make sure to contact, and give the land owner the courtesy of being notified, so they may have an opportunity to respond. I think it would be a good idea to enshrine this step in our POI guidelines. You are right, proper communication shows care, and we should go the extra mile to keep creators and build bridges. I made a mistake in mentioning that SC left after the grant ended when making this request. It is not a false statement, but I can see how it implies your reasons for leaving and that was not my intention. I should have made that clear afterwards instead of continuing to mix the two. I do not believe that we should have POIs highlighting inactive builds that don’t host events, have games, or something that you can actually do in the build. But that doesn’t mean I don’t see value in SC, or that I don’t care to highlight and recognize legacy builders. On the contrary, I think it’s a great idea to have a legacy POI system that takes users on a quest to see the first builds in DCL (king of like a historic preservation society) and I would be happy to help by writing bios, making videos, or collecting and building content. I am for whatever makes Decentraland great, and I think SC is part of that. Thank you again for extending the olive branch. See you around.
2 Likes