by 0x153b2252eddcb3690ae6f5e9f38be13779e1364d (REDACTED)
Should the scene located at -1,-35 be removed from the Point of Interest list?
Sugar Club
I’m just going to put up every POI for a revote. Some have merit, and many do not, and I don’t want my bias to impact who is put up.
In an effort to make a non-emotional assessment of all POI’s I’ll be voting with the following criteria. I know many friends have worked hard to get their POI, and I don’t want anyone to feel hurt by changes to this system. However, it is time to create a new way of finding locations. If a person needs help to upgrade scenes to SDK7 please reach out, there are of people who would be willing to help you!
Criteria:
Is the scene functional? (Screens, elevators, and links working) No, screens and images are blank. I would REALLY love to see this updated to SDK7, as I believe it was the first venue in Decentraland and needs to be memorialized forever. It should have a Historical POI.
Does it require a specific event to be utilized, or can it be interacted with 24/7 (an evergreen scene) It was a music venue in the past with live DJ’s.
If the scene requires a scheduled event, was the last event hosted in a timely manner? I believe the last event was in 2023.
Does the scene hold valuable historical significance? YES, this venue should have a permanent POI on the map, but it also needs to have an explanation as to “why” it is important. I suggest we add it to historical POI’s if/when a new system is developed. As is, it is confusing for new users who do not know the history of this place.
They are still active and moving in other metaverse worlds i think advising of removal and support in brands as popular as sugar should be consider support outreach to continue brand activity in dcl with them.
As stakeholders in Decentraland’s ecosystem, I believe we have a shared responsibility to advance the platform’s development through consistent engagement and meaningful contributions. POI holders, particularly those who have received substantial DAO funding exceeding $50,000, should maintain their scenes’ functionality and actively participate in the platform’s growth. The community has demonstrated exceptional support, including providing voluntary technical assistance to landowners for scene updates, and allocating funds for scene conversions… it’s essential to establish clear and equitable standards for highlighted projects and contributors.
Our POI evaluation criteria should prioritize sustained commitment to Decentraland’s development and demonstrable contributions to increasing Daily Active Users (DAU). This approach would help distinguish between long-term contributors who consistently work toward the platform’s success and those who engage opportunistically. To build Decentraland into a globally recognized platform capable of attracting significant user bases, we must emphasize and reward sustained, meaningful participation over intermittent involvement.
Hey @Sceth thanks for the update regarding the SDK7 upgrade efforts and the technical issues you’re facing. I want to clarify that my previous message reflected my personal perspective on how POIs should operate, emphasizing the importance of consistent development and contributions to Daily Active Users (DAU). This is not an official guideline, but rather my view on how we can ensure equitable recognition of community contributions.
While I understand the technical limitations you’re encountering, I maintain my position based on my belief that POIs should demonstrate sustained engagement and meaningful contributions to the platform’s growth. This perspective is not meant to target any specific individual or project, but rather to advocate for a community standard that rewards consistent participation.
I value our previous dialogue and I’m open to discussing how we can better support creators facing technical challenges while maintaining high standards for community recognition. Cheers.
I’m literally putting up every POI, so please stop trying to make this something more than it is. No one has it out for you, no one thinks you didn’t provide value in the past. It just seemed easier to remove my own bias if every scene is put up for a vote.
I literally almost didn’t put this up just because I knew you’d make an insane amount of drama
But at least it finally got you to actually take steps to update your build so it wasn’t broken.
Very sorry that you felt personally attacked. I’m sure I would feel similar levels of frustration if in your shoes.
I don’t think anyone worth listening to questions the value you brought to Decentraland or your place in its history. And that includes myself who did make that absurd statement “maybe tuda was right” or whatever dumb thing I said in frustration. But in my defense, you pretty much always just attack me as a person and have done so since our first interactions, and unless I’ve blacked out some memories of us interacting, I didn’t start this interpersonal bullshit.
But back to the point at hand, I don’t currently see a reason for you to be upset, it appears as though the voters agree your POI should stay.
If it would make you feel better I can delete this prop since it isn’t going to end in a way that changes anything, and then you can live in peace without it hanging over your head or whatever, since I do know the stress of having open props you find unpleasant being open.
Let me know if that solution works for you, just know that deleting the prop deletes the forum post so if you said anything here you would want to stand the test of time it will also be deleted with it.
I really appreciation your thoughtful explanation, taking ownership of your part in our conflict and happily accept your apology.
I do still think taking meaningful action in regard to districtX is important, but i acknowledge that i could have gone about it better, and i apologize for my approach to the situation, and my generally shitty ability to express my self in a manner other then aggressively when i become defensive or feel unfairly attacked.
Remove the location -1,-35 from the Points of Interest
This proposal is now in status: REJECTED.
Voting Results:
