by 0x521b0fef9cdcf250abaf8e7bc798cbe13fa98692 (HPrivakos)
Money grab.
Previous interations failed to catch engagement.
The team said: “Our business model doesn’t depend on this grant. The reason why we are seeking this grant is to create a relationship with the community and DAO that provides DAO with income.”
TL;DR: We don’t actually need the money
Waste of money.
Passed by RobL.
(That seems like a theme, huh?)
In light of these allegations, I feel it is necessary to address this issue directly with you. Your accusations that our initiatives are merely a fundraising exercise amount to blatant misinformation and manipulation of public opinion. In your words, we are here to make a lot of money. Moreover, the wording of your survey responses points directly to the criminality of your opponents, which is already a direct interpretation and falsification of the facts.
You keep talking about our corruption, but should @StarVote#d61a vote against us on Proposition 2? Take off your “Darth Vader” mask and come to the light side of the Force.
@HPrivakos , this is a matter that needs to be cleared up once and for all. You need to come clean about your true intentions and explain how and why you entered this fight and who supports your presence in this position within the DAO. How can you be against a project that will generate revenue for the DAO, content creators and landowners? If you are against it for some reason, I would like to know who you really are and who is behind you in supporting your position within the structure.
You can’t distort reality like that, I challenge you to a duel. We will have an open conference where you will have to somehow support your claims without distorted questioning. If you refuse, then you are nothing but an information fraud and an impostor, @HPrivakos .
It’s time to clear the air for the community and let everyone be the judge.
I mean, I’m not HP, but the reality is you aren’t going to generate anything for the dao
And your primary supporters in passing your cash grab are the most consistently corrupt people in the DAO.
We invite you to take part in the conference. We would be glad to hear your arguments and express your point of view. It is important to discuss all opinions openly so that the community can form a full and informed view of the situation.
I’m not against the project, I’m against the grant because it won’t generate revenue for the DAO. And you are asking 80k+ just to allow the DAO to receive that money 
You told it yourself that this grant was not necessary for the project to exist, so content creators and landowners will still be able to generate revenues even without this grant.
That’s public, contributing to Decentraland since 2017, ex-Foundation member, current DAO Committee member, fighting for Decentraland to succeed by empowering the DAO.
We are not medieval knights
The community doesn’t need a conference to figureout that there isn’t any DAU to generate advertising revenue from and paying you to do anything is a waste of money
Also, you had to repeatedly submit this grant to get it to pass
it is a disrespectful waste of time for you to pretend that you are anything besides hollow cash hungry ____
Everyone knows who StarVote#d61a is, and minimizing DAO corruption to a George Lucas film franchise indicates a level of professionalism I’m not comfortable supporting (especially when you later challenge HPrivakos to a duel).
Hard truths:
Given your response , it seems it really is time to consider replacing those in positions of power like yourself who have not demonstrated the professionalism needed to develop Decentraland. The fact that you have been involved in the project since 2017 and still bringing Decentraland to its current state speaks volumes. Perhaps it is time for a fresh perspective and a new administration that can truly empower the DAO and contribute to Decentraland’s success.
I have not heard a single question about functionality, features, metrics by which we will measure the success of the project, questions about ROI from all those who commented
What level of professionalism can we talk about?
I don’t know who StarVote#d61a is and my words above refer not only to him, but to everyone who votes against the project on instinct and emotionally.
You can’t speak for the whole community. You can only speak for yourself. There is more than enough detail in the project, please read it if you don’t want to meet face-to-face.
You need users to monetize advertising
Your prop does nothing to help Decentraland where it is now
You yourself stated that you don’t need this money to build your company
Therefore it isn’t even a valid platform grant.
I’m actually not sure there is any need to revoke this grant as I don’t think it is valid and there is no reason for the GSS to approve any vesting contract and ask the DAO committee to create one.
Traffic is there and you can and should already work with it.
“Your prop does nothing to help Decentraland where it is now” - you’re a product analyst, product ovner, where did that thought come from, what data did it come from?
“You yourself stated that you don’t need this money to build your company” - please re-read what we said.
This simply isn’t a valid Platform Category Grant, and your condescending retorts do not give any indication you are here for anything besides an easy pay day
this grant was voted down by the community once before, and this passing iteration was forced through last minute with stolen VP
There simply isn’t any reason to engage further with you in a vein attempt to have an intellectually honest conversation
You don’t need DCL, and those within DCL who would like to utilize your services are free to pay for them out of pocket themselves
Your comments seem biased and based on incomplete information. It must be emphasised that traffic in Decentraland exists and should be used effectively. The statement that our proposal “does nothing to help Decentraland in its current state” is not true. I’ll repeat the question: where do you get the data for this conclusion?
Regarding your comment that this proposal is invalid and was “pushed through at the last minute with stolen VPs”, I would like to remind you that the voting process was conducted in accordance with established DAO rules. If you have evidence to the contrary, please present it.
Suggesting that further discussion is pointless only shows an unwillingness to engage in open and honest dialogue.
I would like to remind you that your grant request had already failed
I would also like to remind you this isn’t a valid Platform Grant
You, much like RobL, are incapable of “open and honest dialogue”
I agree with @HPrivakos 's proposal.
Revoke Advertising Platform
This proposal is now in status: FINISHED.
Voting Results:
Revoke Advertising Platform
This proposal has been PASSED by a DAO Committee Member (0xfb1afa4dc069ffb47b19dbee196045d508fcd5a2)
