[DAO:c114c83] Should we replace the DAO & Foundation members every 4 Years?

Governance
1

by 0xbc02db030361121dd43bbb2fcbcb4f9f98c1dc7d (Ambassador)

This is similar to presidents serving a maximum year of 4 years.

We all know and understand how stressful & demanding these positions can be. Because they are expected to perform under pressure which can take it’s toll over time. Especially within those 4 years.

I feel this is fair & necessary. It has worked for democratic countries with constitution, I don’t see why or how it can not work for us.

Happy to hear your thoughts & opinions.

Please Vote: Yes or No

  • Yes
  • No
  • Invalid question/options

Vote on this proposal on the Decentraland DAO

View this proposal on Snapshot

2

Some more context:

Screenshot_2023-08-01_01-30-53
Screenshot_2023-08-01_01-30-53928×949 157 KB

Screenshot_2023-07-17_10-52-43
Screenshot_2023-07-17_10-40-30
Screenshot_2023-07-17_10-35-57

1 Like
3

The DAO has no right to state how the foundation is run, nor how foundation stakeholders/employees are managed/appointed, which renders this poll question invalid.

1 Like
4

This proposal seems invalid. DAO votes can’t change Foundation structure. And DAO members are we all, we can’t replace ourselves for another group of people.

5

No, these are not positions of power, they are positions of responsibility. A forced turnover only ensures that we would be at risk of choosing the candidates who are suboptimal.

6

Should we replace the DAO & Foundation members every 4 Years?

This proposal is now in status: REJECTED.

Voting Results:

  • Yes 1% 179,607 VP (26 votes)
  • No 8% 1,509,225 VP (14 votes)
  • Invalid question/options 91% 16,396,748 VP (63 votes)