[DAO:c114c83] Should we replace the DAO & Foundation members every 4 Years?

by 0xbc02db030361121dd43bbb2fcbcb4f9f98c1dc7d (Ambassador)

This is similar to presidents serving a maximum year of 4 years.

We all know and understand how stressful & demanding these positions can be. Because they are expected to perform under pressure which can take it’s toll over time. Especially within those 4 years.

I feel this is fair & necessary. It has worked for democratic countries with constitution, I don’t see why or how it can not work for us.

Happy to hear your thoughts & opinions.

Please Vote: Yes or No

  • Yes
  • No
  • Invalid question/options

Vote on this proposal on the Decentraland DAO

View this proposal on Snapshot

Some more context:


1 Like

The DAO has no right to state how the foundation is run, nor how foundation stakeholders/employees are managed/appointed, which renders this poll question invalid.

1 Like

This proposal seems invalid. DAO votes can’t change Foundation structure. And DAO members are we all, we can’t replace ourselves for another group of people.

No, these are not positions of power, they are positions of responsibility. A forced turnover only ensures that we would be at risk of choosing the candidates who are suboptimal.

Should we replace the DAO & Foundation members every 4 Years?

This proposal is now in status: REJECTED.

Voting Results:

  • Yes 1% 179,607 VP (26 votes)
  • No 8% 1,509,225 VP (14 votes)
  • Invalid question/options 91% 16,396,748 VP (63 votes)