My advice still stands @AaronLeupp. You should know by now that I’m not here to ‘do dirty’ to anyone, and ultimately, just like you, I have the right to both a vote, and to harbour my own opinion. I ask that you respect that, just like I actively aim respect your view, and your interests/intent/ambitions.
I understand that getting a large No Vote last minute sucks, and I’m aware that such an approach is frustrating. However, I only vote if I deem it necessary, and in this case, I did deem it necessary.
I’m personally still waiting to see the results for the Waifumon Gen-2 Linked Wearables which was passed a month ago (a proposal which I supported). As far as I know, there’s still some work left to be done on that project?
Additionally, one must keep in mind that this is your 3rd consecutive proposal for a linked wearable this month, and whilst I have no problem with volume when it comes to proposals, I feel this specific proposal can be far more detailed when it comes to outlining the scope and strategy behind the proposal itself.
@AaronLeupp, a lot of your proposals often follow a similar trend, where important sections related to your proposal’s value are simply linked to your website, as opposed to filling out the form with the necessary information. In some cases, that approach worked, especially when there’s a long detailed writeup of what you’re trying to say. In other cases, such as this one, I personally feels it falls short of being apt in conveying the value you wish to bring to the community, however this can totally be worked upon.
Tell us more about your motivation
Tell us more about how you’ll be building out the 100% cash back on mints, with what plan. Tell us where you’ll be hosting, how you’ll be marketing, what utility you aim to drive with this move, and what communities you wish to empower/interact with.
That’s my two cents. No ‘doing dirty’ here; just voting on the proposal that’s been put on the table.