[DAO:8971a77] Should we remove the Strategic Unit and prevent $32k in DAO funds from being spent?

“Code of Ethics” from a guy that votes with delegated VP on his own proposals :slight_smile:

I think some people from decentraland need a real job, so they can stay away from the DAO funds.
So, Lordy is a good start :slight_smile:

My vote:

  • Revoke the Strategic Unit grant
1 Like

Hey HP you seem to have misunderstood me. It’s not about what I’ve accomplished since my grant was approved; rather, it’s about the strategic initiatives that I initially set in motion and continue to advance. Implementing a DAO Strategy and Treasury Management process is a lengthy endeavor. If you had been following the Financial Working Group or had attended our Strategic Planning meetings, you would see that work is in progress.

For example, during our 6th Strategic Planning session, I invited key industry experts in digital assets(Treasury) management, such as Karpatkey—who manages the Ethereum Name System Endowment Fund—and Avantgarde Finance. I continue to engage with them, and there will be updates on this front soon.

In three days, I have a scheduled update on my grant where I will provide comprehensive details on the work I’ve been doing.


As to Organizational Chart - it is the heart of DAOs onboarding and structure for new comers and Community members who want to understand how DAO works and who is for what responsible and my DAO proposal specifies what the chart should include and mandates responsibility, specifying the Core Units (Governance Squad and Strategic Unit) accountable for its upkeep because without timely updates and responsible ones for that, the chart might not reflect the current DAO structure, leading to misunderstanding.

Btw, you voted ‘yes’ in the first stage of this proposal :joy:.

Its wild that with different core units which DAO has paid significant amounts of money we still don’t have it as well as there is inaccurate and outdated documentation on Decentraland website on how DAO works.

How much $ already received grant based Core Units:

  1. Governance Squad: 471,360$ (this amount does not include a new grant of 187,504 $)
  2. Grant Support Squad: 187,200$ (this amount does not include a new grant of 114,600 $)
  3. Facilitation Squad: 153, 000$ (this amount does not include a new grant of $98,500 $)
  4. Strategic Unit: 0$

I predicted the forum spam to fill the first five messages as quickly as possible so people have to click “show more” on the governance page =)

Yes, because it was a poll gauging interests, the draft and governance proposals were useless, especially if it’s just to say “I’ll do it” while it was already done by someone else.

Misleading. Strategic Unit: $5,333 (in a couple days) (this amount does not include 26,667$ still to be vested)


The Decentraland DAO is the decision-making tool for MANA, NAMES and LAND holders in Decentraland’s virtual world. Through votes in the DAO, the Community can have a say in important aspects of the virtual world, including grants, POIs, Names, policies, catalyst nodes, LAND and Estate smart contracts, and any other issues the Community deems relevant.

For example, the Pre-Proposal Poll was created to gauge Community sentiment, and no one can take away my right to post DAO proposals or to seek the Community’s opinion. If you disagree with my poll, feel free to vote ‘no’. These proposals are my personal initiative. I care about LAND owners, as LAND is the heart of Decentraland IMO. I also believe that the revocation process for Grants should involve the Community in making the final decision. By the way, I’ve always been for decentralization (look at the screens).

Regarding the LAND proposal, similar topics were discussed in 2019 and 2020. There’s no reason I can’t seek the Community’s opinion on it in 2023! Also, it’s worth noting that you don’t represent the entire DAO. There are Community members who find value in my polls and consider them interesting topics for discussion, as evidenced by the comments on the Land Poll, for example.






I wrote as of today. This is your personal opinion with which I do not agree, If you don’t like it - vote “NO”.

It’s not personal opinion, it’s facts.
It’s not something the DAO Committee can enact, therefore this governance proposal is useless, like jar0d ban or features requests proposals.
Crazy that a Core Unit, Strategic Unit team member doesn’t know that.
I already voted Abstain on it because it’s invalid.

1 Like

DAO Committee shouldn’t. Please look carefully at Implementation Pathways, I think you again missed the point.

And please read what is Governance Proposal.

Some proposals are not as simple as adding or removing an item from a list, they require community signaling, discussions and implementation paths. Those proposals should be submitted thorugh a three-stage governance process that starts with a poll and ends with a binding proposal.

The voting process includes three steps: a Pre-Proposal Poll, a Draft Proposal, and a Governance Proposal. Each tier will have progressively increasing submission and passage thresholds to ensure important governance decisions are made by a representative majority (based on Voting Power). Each step must reach the defined VP threshold to be promoted to the next one.


Along with being generally unfit for the position, LL has consistently demonstrated themselves to be a person of a duplicitous nature. There are very few people who have ever collaborated or worked closely with LL who have something nice to say about them over a time frame of any reasonable length.

LL has spent more time trying to strategically keep this grant then he has how to help the dao do anything.

1 Like

Cmon man you are mad because I voted “No” on your grant. Rethink your behavior, stop attacking Community members and me personally and I will reconsider my decision.

You vote on grants solely based on the person submitting it rather than on the content of the grant itself?


as someone who is exactly the kind of person you’re talking about, warning others to not “get lordliked” is a civic duty

ZESTYBEAM is aware of the ongoing war and dangerous conditions in Ukraine. Despite this, he still wishes for me to return there. I find this to be not just culturally insensitive but a blatant disregard for my safety, bordering on a wish for my harm or even death.

Offtopic. Is this some way connected with your grant?

Oh here is another member that constantly harasses someone including me and not only.

jail != death, but keep pushing that false narrative since you’ve got nothing else. maybe you can kiss chris between the cheeks and get me muted again. until then, cry harder.

Hey, Lordy, I usually go after scamers, bruh. <3

1 Like

I don’t care if anyone votes No on things they don’t believe in.

I do wonder why you would have votes Yes for my Grant until the final 30 minutes when it reached a majority of Yes votes, then switch to Abstain for 10 minutes, until I once again reached a majority of Yes votes and then switched to No.

I can’t personally think of a reason where a person of integrity would change their votes in such a way over the closing minutes of a grant proposal.

And while that is certainly among the reasons I don’t consider you to be an intellectually honest person acting in the best interest of anyone other than yourself, it is certainly not the full extant of reasons you have demonstrated to be untrustworthy.

Are there any existing members of a DAO core team willing to speak up on your behalf and say that we are mistaken and you aren’t just trying to take credit for the work others have already done?

I don’t need the DAO core team to speak up on my behalf. I am a Decentraland DAO Delegate -Community servant. The decisions of the DAO will speak on my behalf, and I will respect them no matter what they may be.