by 0x37f00ec67d68c2d3c662339c183d37403c36f28e (AaronLeupp)
Allow Previous Voters to give 1-5 star ratings on previous grants they voted on as well as a written review on the person and results that was pitched on the grant.
Open to all debate.
- Invalid question/options
Vote on this proposal on the Decentraland DAO
View this proposal on Snapshot
Grantees would get 5 stars from their friends, and 1 star from people who dislike them. It would turn into a popularity contest.
The DAO Governance Squad are better judges of grantees performance against grant milestones. A better rating system would be based on milestones achieved, as determined by the DAO Governance Squad.
For example, if 4 milestones were set in the proposal, and grantee only achieved 3 of them, they get a 3.75 rating on a 0-5 scale (3/4 = 0.75, 0.75*5 = 3.75)
Open to some form of qualitative response when voting, but don’t think we need a structured star rating system or to incentivize a “written review on the person” who submitted the grant.
Every Grant has a dedicated channel opened in the DAO Discord. Anyone is welcome to go give ratings on the grants performance, and review of the grant through that medium.
Allow Previous Voters to give 1-5 star ratings on previous grants they voted
This proposal is now in status: REJECTED.
- Yes 20% 258,452 VP (101 votes)
- No 27% 351,684 VP (5 votes)
- Invalid question/options 53% 664,440 VP (19 votes)