Appreciate your support. 
1 Like
A Statement from the DAO Facilitation Squad: The following is a response from Matimio, followed by Fehz, from the DAO Facilitation Squad
From Matimio
There are a few notable issues with this proposal. First, it is an individual applying to create a “strategic unit,” which is comprised of only one person, not a unit working together toward a specific objective. Second, it is very difficult to see what the “strategic” objective and impacts are, particularly given the third problem, that much of the work is already being conducted by a core unit comprised of 4 people, that was recently approved by the DAO.
I am a firm believer that the DAO should support as many people as legitimately possible, and those that can demonstrate reasons to receive compensation for their work will be supported to do so. This could have been a great example of how a member of the community moves into a facilitation role. It could have been done in a way that is generative and builds on the structures and work that has been done over the past year and a half by the Facilitation Squad. Instead it proposes to do the same work as a unit who was just renewed one month ago, with 8M VP in favor, and creates a potentially contentious rather than cooperative context doing so.
I support Lordlike being compensated for greater involvement in identifying and forwarding strategic interests of the DAO. For helping to facilitate general and specific interest groups find expression of their interests. I do not support a replication of work, failure to coordinate a “strategic” proposal like this with existing core units so it can be put forward in a generative and constructive way. I do believe Lordlike would have found wide support from us and other units, for example, in helping to create a strategic working group unit, making sure that there is a division of tasks and responsibilities, and coordination so there is not double work. There could have even been discussions about expanding the size of the Facilitation Squad to include new members.
Instead, this proposal was put forward in a way that shows a lack of strategic awareness and coordination; it is repetitious and even potentially plagiarizing of Facilitation Squad’s work.
From Fehz
While I believe in the importance of rewarding contributors to DAO decision-making processes (a topic currently under discussion in the strategic planning working group), I don’t think that creating a single-person twin Facilitation Squad with reduced scope and overlapping responsibilities is the appropriate solution. I believe there are several alternative approaches that could be considered:
- Propose a governance initiative to establish a Strategic Planning Unit/Squad/Committee.
- Propose a governance initiative to develop a clear incentives structure for the Working Groups framework, transforming it into a comprehensive program.
- Reframe this grant opportunity to focus on your specific role within the Working Groups framework, which already has a designated scope for facilitation.
1 Like
LordLike has shown lots of interest for taking care of the DAO as a whole in the recent months, I’m cheering for him to be able to prove himself.
4 Likes
Hey Facilitation Squad, thank you for your feedback.
Firstly, the fact that I am applying as an individual does not negate the potential impact of the strategic unit I wish to form. The size of the unit does not inherently dictate its effectiveness or efficiency. I believe that, with my skills and dedication, I can bring a significant contribution to our DAO, even if it starts as a one-person unit. The possibility of expanding the team is always open as we move forward.
My unique strategic approach is reflected in my contributions to the Decentraland DAO, such as the ‘DAO Strategy and Roadmap’, ‘Treasury Management’, and ‘Code of Ethics’ proposals. These initiatives, which I’ve proposed, signify my commitment to driving strategic initiatives within our DAO.
The objectives of my role are to identify and facilitate strategic initiatives, improve the DAO governance user experience, and maintain Community feedback. I aim to facilitate strategic-planning and other relevant strategic working groups, organize and participate in Community meetups, compose and publish DAO reports, and conduct research on DAO building and structuring topics. These activities are designed to strengthen the DAO and ensure effective communication and consensus-building within the Community.
The similarities you may observe are due to the common responsibilities that those in DAO facilitator roles undertake. Engaging the Community, carrying out initiatives, guiding discussions - these are common responsibilities in the nature of the roles we are assuming. Such overlap is unavoidable and should not be mistaken as imitation. My unique value comes from my individual approach to these common responsibilities and the distinct strategic initiatives I have and will continue to propose.
In terms of collaboration, I assure you that I am committed to maintaining open communication, coordinating tasks, and working collaboratively. We have already been collaborating within the strategic planning working group, and I plan to continue this cooperative approach.
I believe that embarking on this journey separately fosters decentralization. There should not be a singular “Central Core Units” in my opinion. The diversity of approaches and ideas is what strengthens a DAO, and separate core units working towards similar objectives, but from different perspectives, only enriches our ecosystem.
- Propose a governance initiative to establish a Strategic Planning Unit/Squad/Committee.
In my existing role as a facilitator for DAO strategic working groups, I aim to provide substantial value to the DAO. This role aligns with a DAO Core Unit’s concept - a incentivized team serving the DAO’s strategic needs.
- Propose a governance initiative to develop a clear incentives structure for the Working Groups framework, transforming it into a comprehensive program.
While agreeing on the need for clear incentives for Working Groups, this doesn’t diminish my grant proposal’s relevance. These initiatives can actually strengthen each other, bolstering our DAO.
- Reframe this grant opportunity to focus on your specific role within the Working Groups framework, which already has a designated scope for facilitation.
My proposal seamlessly aligns with the existing working groups. It is about establishing a Core Unit that can take a comprehensive view of the DAO’s strategic direction. The existence of a separate strategic core unit would ensure that strategic thinking is always at the forefront of our DAO’s operation. It guarantees that there is always a team devoted to looking at the bigger picture, beyond the more task-focused mandate of working groups. This role would also observe the DAO’s overall strategic growth, gathering insights from all working groups and considering strategic trends, the external environment, and DAO’s long-term vision. I believe I am capable of fulfilling this role based on my experience with strategic initiatives that I described below.
1 Like
Thank you that you believe in me! 
3 Likes
P.S. I would also like to mention that much of what I’ve outlined in my proposal reflects the work I’m already carrying out for the DAO. My dedication and ability to fulfill the responsibilities of this role effectively are demonstrated through my facilitation of strategic-planning and financial-planning (Treasury Management) working groups, which were established following the successful passage of my relevant DAO proposals.
Also, here are some of the DAO proposals I have submitted:
1 Like
We need a Facilitation squad to Facilite the facilitation squad!! 
voted yes!!(as if 100 vp matters)
This guy is spending time on building the governance of DAO for free long enough!
give this guy his grant! he deserves it! and the DAO needs extra mechanism!!!
2 Likes
Thank you for your kind words and support.
2 Likes
LordLike - great proposal. I see the hard work you do for this platform and believe you truly have it and the community’s best interest as top priority. I support this initiative and proposal. I like that you have built in checks and balances and that you’ve already done a lot for DCL without compensation. I respect your decision and goal of being more involved and taking your role more seriously.
3 Likes
LordLike has demonstrated his commitment and expertise in driving DAO strategic directions, conducting research, and actively engaging with the community. His proposed objectives, such as strengthening governance guidelines and facilitating strategic initiatives, align perfectly with the growth and success of the Decentraland DAO. I believe LordLike’s contributions will have a significant impact on enhancing transparency, fostering inclusivity, and achieving the DAO’s strategic goals!
3 Likes
Thank you for this inspiring words ))
2 Likes
Appreciate your feedback 
1 Like
When I think of the DAO, I think of @fractilians , @Zino and @web3nit 3 names I see the most involvement from. Lordlike has reached out to me several times in regards to different things, my proposal, attending a workgroup (which I admittedly suck at remembering to attend) and I see his consistent engagement in the proposals forum and his submissions. I think he should at the minimum be granted something for the work he has put in towards the betterment of Decentraland and the DAO. I major factor that stands out to me, unlike others in the Discord or proposal forum, he keeps his head level, he does not lash out at others has treated people with respect. There are several that need to take a look in the mirror and change their ways and learn to handle issues better. You will get what you put in. Good luck Lordlike. Either way your contributions do not go unnoticed and it is appreciated.
2 Likes
Thank you for words of support. 
Decentraland and DAO - are one of the brightest and my favorite projects that have ever been in my life.
2 Likes
I have seen LordLike beeing very active in DAO and it is a yes for me!
I am not a fan of how currently facilitation squad is working so this might be the right path to slowly replace them with active community members who are truly making impact in Decentraland DAO (This might not be the intetion of this proposal, but I am hoping it will happen).
1 Like
@web3nit has done many great things for this community! He is a leader and not a follower. We need more individuals like Lordlike in our community to grow DCL into a robust Metaverse. We are wishing him great success on his newest and continued endeavor! He can do it!
1 Like
While I appreciate Lordlike’s consistency and contributions to the DAO, I often disagree heavily with not only his perspective but methods and proposals also.
What concerns me is that this doesn’t seem to be an attempt to setup a squad of sorts where users would put forth ideas/research freely (as we already have been doing in the DAO discord and solid proposals). But instead, an attempt to act as the gate for legitimatizing ideas/opinions/methods.
While I don’t think that is the intention, it is most definitely the result of establishing a single leader responsible for research and ‘strategy’ - currently, anyone can provide this role, and many have, through expertise or public debate, joined in and facilitated these conversations.
The idea of electing a single paid position to verify/research concepts does not seem to align with the general opensource nature of our metaverse.
What’s more, I do not believe there is many people who would qualify for such a role should it exist, it would be the equivalent to a Chief Strategy Officer for a 20-100M treasury and thousands of active users.
Perhaps Lordlike has much IRL experience being a CSO and qualifies to act single-handedly for this position, but I do not think that DAO participation and proposal submissions alone are enough to substantiate my faith in his single-handed leadership.
The fact it is a proposal for themselves, and not for the position itself has me concerned. Where is the opportunity to host an election role should we choose to create it?
How is that not exactly what Matimo is doing based on his very reply in this thread?
Because the facilitation squad is exactly that, a squad, and adding to that group ensures accountability between its members, as opposed to installing a new squad with only one member.
What accountability?
If we continue to just inflate the size of Squads and create a scenario where we either pass everything they are doing or none of it, we are creating a system that will inevitably become corrupt.
Squads are flawed in their design, and by creating the “core unit” budget category they have attempted to elevate themselves above everyone else and remove the ability to properly measure there work, given they are allowed to select their own teethless metrics for measurement.
1 Like