by 0x0c678c84cc5744f2a5b368ce2aeab3905624ff99 (BitcoinETF)
I propose reducing the VP requirement for all POI proposals from 2M VP back to 500K VP
Despite the newly formed council claim that low DAO participation is due to users having less VP, evidence shows the higher threshold is the true barrier.
Address two issues with one effort.
Do you still believe rewarding users with unlimited VP is the best solution or lowering VP threshold is?
Because the 5 seat council seems clueless around this topic.
There is enough VP, it’s just that people don’t want to vote.
Suppose you fix this by rewarding more VP.
Either way, I’m confused about which side of the fence you’re on. 
Not sure if you know how to read. The forum post I authored clearly states that it was from a personal perspective and not a representative from or a collective representation of the DAO Council.
I feel that the others share the same view as you, since they haven’t responded or shared their own perspective hence referring to all five.
And yes, I can read just fine.
Makes sense…
I’ve been saying for a while that we should introduce +25/100k VP for people that own POIs…
It’s not an easy status to earn…
When the community voted on MerySharks POI, we saw that even if most of the daily active users voted yes, we didn’t even come close to having enough VP to pass it the first time. It only went through on the second try when users with more VP, who aren’t online in DCL every day, voted. I’m not sure if 500K VP might be too low - I think 1M VP would make more sense - but since I agree with the direction of this proposal, I’m voting yes. It would be nice if the users who are online in DCL daily could define the POI independently.
Percentage based VP… Is a solution to this…
6 x L1 wearable collections already have VP.
The current VP mechanism in place is good IMHO. We just need to encourage more participation.
I am curious to understand why our users and council members are struggling to comprehend this simple logic.
What’s the point of creating more VP out of thin air when we already have ~1.6B VP in circulation?
Better option would be to autonomously gamify this by hats similar to harry potter’s sorting hats in hogwarts castle.
refer to my upcoming poll proposal coming today
Lower VP Threshold for POI (Point of Interest) to 500K VP
This proposal is now in status: FINISHED.
Voting Results:
Lower VP Threshold for POI (Point of Interest) to 500K VP
This proposal has been PASSED by a DAO Committee Member (0xfb1afa4dc069ffb47b19dbee196045d508fcd5a2)
