[DAO:23bbcc3] Meta GamiMall Expansion & Empowerment (2nd Submission)

So is this a quid pro quo thing? You get their votes and they get yours?

Everyone has the right to express their attitude by voting, and so does you, I notice you vote down every proposal that relates to us which is a little confusing, I never asked you did you do that because I voted down one of your proposals, right? I respect your choice, please respect others’ choices as well, and don’t make such irresponsible conclusions easily.

And what’s even more confusing is that most of those who voted yes to this proposal have not submitted a proposal for a long time. There is only one exception BPFarm’s 9.5k votes, may I ask if this is where you are coming from? If so, I want to clarify that they did not ask me to vote for their proposal, but I did since I really love their project and think it’s a good thing for DCL. We did not ask them to vote on ours as well.

Meta GamiMall Expansion & Empowerment (2nd Submission)

This proposal is now in status: PASSED.

Voting Results:

  • Yes 79% 7,890,651 VP (174 votes)
  • No 16% 1,675,908 VP (21 votes)
  • Abstain 5% 532,922 VP (10 votes)

Meta GamiMall Expansion & Empowerment (2nd Submission)

This proposal has been ENACTED by a DAO Committee Member (0x88013d7ed946dd8292268a6ff69165a97a89a639)

Vesting Contract Address: 0xa03021A7603aa3581435F978b1621aCC516842B7