Ok bet probably wise. Maybe some sort of system where the banned names can have wild cards with potentially rare exceptions to a rule. Really tough to come up with something overarching here but I agree this is a non-optimal use of voting power and the DAO.
You mean people who voted to ban a name that is derogatory, hateful, and promotes violence against a group of people based solely on their religion? As opposed to a name that targets an individual public figure, and expresses an opinion on his character or performance? There is no equivalence between the two and the former is by definition “hate speech.”