@Matimio I just want to make sure I understand correctly. Are we enacting the working groups findings in a Binding Governance Proposal? Or are they going through the entire 3-step procedure of the governance like pre-poll, draft, final proposal?
For instance, it seems right here that while these working groups may NOT have the intention of creating Binding Governance Proposals, but it could still turn into a binding governance proposal.
If I understand this correctly, this seems like it could be used as a new loophole to avoid the first 2 steps of the proposal stages [DAO: QmSjXh1] DAO Governance Proposal Stages by creating a working group then proposing their findings as a Binding Governance Final Proposal. Can you explain this to make sure I am understanding this properly? As of now, I am interpreting this as a way for the DAO Facilitation Squad to gain more power from the working groups to be able to bypass the 3-step DAO process enacted by you.
As of now this is how it looks to me: Matimio created the idea of have governance proposals in 3 stages. Matimio will be in charge of facilitating these working groups, along with his DAO Facilitator Squad. These working groups can be created by the first 2 proposals (which are just for creation of working groups). Then the final binding governance proposal can be to enact the findings of the working group. This seems like a way to bypass the DAO due process that Matimio enacted so he has the ability to create working groups that could potentially (without “intention”) create final governance. So it looks like he is creating a new way for governance to be enacted 1. Easily through his DAO Facilitator Squad, or 2. a 3-step governance process.
I hope you can clarify this and tell me I am wrong.
My other question is where will these working groups take place? What kind of procedures will their be for mediation of discussion?