I don’t agree with you. I provided relevant information for the build! It takes just one click to “Jump in,” see the build, its name, and check all the details. I provided enough information for a quick read and “Jump in” for a full review, despite the 250-character limitation on the proposal
A few “Add” examples in line are builds that should have Points of Interest (POI), considering a healthy experience for new users and maintaining a high standard of build quality, even in a rain of “Removed” proposals.
If you don’t like the way I provide information, please feel free to do it yourself and invest your personal time, or create a proposal to use DAO funds to pay someone who will create the proposals in a satisfactory way for you and everyone
Since you already know how awesome this build is and still considering to vote “NO,” I think this is quite “WTF”
P.S. “Comment was recently Edited on from " still voted “NO,””
to "still considering to vote “NO,”