by 0x598f8af1565003ae7456dac280a18ee826df7a2c (pablo)
TLDR; this is a rough idea, can be more polished if it passes:
Put limits per proposals, it will allow more cases, more people participating, more opportunities and more contributions. Someone can ask for smaller timebox grants, having to sell less MANA, e.g for 2 months, instead of selling all the MANA for 6 or 12 months.
Require 60% of acceptance between yes and no votes. Avoiding controversial proposals, only those with more agreement will pass.
Set the limits and budget based on MANA price
Most of the budget should go to Plattform initiatives, open-source projects and tooling for the community.
Proposals should be reviewed before enacted, that fulfills all requirements so that we can avoid future revocations.
Hey pablo, I am voting no just because of 1 point which was,
Require 60% of acceptance between yes and no votes. Avoiding controversial proposals, only those with more agreement will pass.
As much as I agree we should have some better rules for controversial proposals, In my opinion we should not implement such thing just because I dont think No votes should weigh more heavy then a yes vote.
( It’s like saying if you vote no you have 10%+ more VP)
thats what your supposed to do they need you to fill thier coffers . Got keep that ponzi alive man so rich get richer while you all kick the money can around for them. Invest invest invest
This one is going to be another NO from me Pablo. Im so sorry to see it looks like you got lost somewhere along the ride. You seem to have lost the spirit of DCL along the way and decided that your self interests were more important than the needs of the community. Please stop proposing things that further limit voting and accessibility to the DCL platform unless your intentions are to kill Decentraland. If your intentions are to destroy the platform, please take your energy elsewhere.
What is a controversial proposal? Your recent sammich game being put under the “platform” category when it should clearly not be in there. (while also touting education with a grant that has spelling errors in it)
Your grants that pass should be revoked and I hope you get your selfishness in check. You clearly do not know how to lead DCL to a brighter future anymore and need to take a step back to reflect on your recent proposals and how they might impact the platform in the long run. As someone who has background in government and governence in the real world I can say that you clearly either do not know what you are doing, or you know exactly what you are doing… either way is massively detrimental to DCL in my opinion.
. Got keep that ponzi alive man so rich get richer while you all kick the money can around for them. Invest invest invest