[DAO:2086ed3] Implementing a "Tier Governance Structure" for the DAO

I agree with all the problem statement points.

I personally thought it was a decent tier structure all the way until tier one.

It seems like tier one and God tier could easily be hijacked by bad actors with a lot VP. In other words if we don’t fix our broken voting structure this tier based system will just create a disaster, and give power to the wrong people. within this model I don’t think a god tier should exist since their responsibilities fall in line with what Foundation does for the product, and they are not required to do anything that the DAO says.

I was also wondering who enforces all this? to my understanding tier 1 eliminates the current operational arm in our DAO, so who will be the one set up the multi sig wallets. how will the power to the DAO contracts be passed over? How will we make sure the new holders of the information will be held accountable of any wrong doings?

I also feel like there needs to be a different way of electing members into the different tiers besides voting power. perhaps a Karma based structure would be better or if there is an experience based structure that can be developed that would be a better way to elect members into different tiers.

I know this was mentioned earlier in the forums post about the CBI model that @Unknower is concepting (which i have read and have provided feedback to) maybe, if its possible the 2 of you can join forces to develop the what the next version of this conversation will look like.

Hope this feedback helps ^.^

2 Likes