Collection 'BioSkin V2 2024' created by VTATV is ready for review!

Community Wearables
1

BioSkin V2 2024

View entire collection

Wearables

BioSkin V2

2

I will check collection now!

1 Like
3

Published and ready THX XD

4

Hey @BioMETA, sorry, but we don’t approve wearables with static parts for a long time already, and dev team told us to avoid wearables like that / ask publisher to update it. :frowning:

Make sure to weight paint legs correctly and avoid any static parts :pray:

1 Like
5

np adjusting and submitting soon thanks

1 Like
6

GLB has been updated with changes and ready for review NAME changed to VTATVBOT V2 and legs added

1 Like
7

Hey @BioMETA

Wearable is good to go, add this categories to overrides list, and I will approve collection

overrides → wearables

  • hat
  • helmet
  • eyewear
  • earring
  • mask
  • tiara
  • handwear

overrides → base body

  • head
  • hand
1 Like
8

updated and ready for published with all needed tweaks

9

image
image974Ă—796 86.8 KB

10

@BioMETA collection approved!

1 Like
11

thank you so much for the rapid response see you at unmodays

12

some trait updates have been made and finalized

1 Like
13

collection re-approved! @BioMETA

1 Like
14

a small update to the wearable once again in restriction access management function was lifted to secure asset

1 Like
15

collection re-approved! @BioMETA

16

Any idea when will Decentraland ever bring back smart wearables this has hurt our brand and has really hurt our holders forcing us to possibly refund them soon if this can’t get rectified and also drop our rates to little to :free:. A lot of these functions and overall Decentraland isn’t holding up to a business quality or gamer ready platform where creators and content creators, influencers plus more can’t build with any tools provided effectively. Many brands like vtatv depended on many functions that was taken away this being one of them ( smart wearables). Is there any way we can substitute or create a solution to this issue and or issues to Decentraland unstable network/functionality’s.

Also our land has also become pretty much obsolete with no traffic or any usable functions that allow a stable experience for users or new users to keep user retention on this platform. With the migration of sdk6 to sdk7 and updates to the syntax as well on sdk7 it’s made it impossible for users as myself who don’t code to keep wasting money as well not to mention the publishing fees that occur for these actions. Would land re-compensation be the resolution here for people who own over 15 lands and tons of assets invested to the platform of no traffic or support from its own foundational representatives in a action plan for immediate repair or solutions.