Disclaimer: on-the-need-for-professional-level-interviews-of-the-council-postulants
From a member of the DAO Committee and the Security Advisory Board, I would expect a better understanding of the Terms of Use.
In this document is outlined how the Foundation is claiming the Intellectual Property on their productions, which includes the various Unity clients developed for the experience of entering Decentraland, and the various SDK APIs developed for the experience of creating in Decentraland.
However, from conversations with the applicant, it is unclear there is the proper understanding of the following clause:
The Foundation does not own or control Decentraland, as ownership and governance is decentralized in the community through the DAO.
The applicant has even gone as far as to claim that the Foundation could claim control of github repositories hosting DAO-funded projects, such as the alternative Godot client.