From Silence to Structure: What the DAO Needs Now

TL;DR:

The DAO must act now to include the community in its decision-making - or risk losing the momentum created by the restructuring and repeating the same mistakes that weakened the old DAO. We’ve built a new structure - now let’s use it. I have ideas for how we can do that, and I’m sharing them here.

Strategic Communication as a Bridge Between DAO, Community, and Vision

With the publication of “Decentraland DAO Executive Arm: 18-Month Objectives & Key Focus Areas”, the DAO enters a new chapter - shaped by strategic execution and a renewed sense of responsibility. But this shift does not come without its paradox: a new structure was introduced to fix the old one, yet it emerged from the same broken system. Now it must prove that it can do better.

While the Council’s roadmap is ambitious, I believe the Executive Arm’s most difficult task lies not in execution, but in representation. The real challenge is to understand, unite, and act on behalf of a community that remains fragmented, fatigued, and still recovering from past governance failures. To succeed, the DAO must do more than implement goals - it must rebuild trust and legitimacy. For me, that begins with one fundamental truth: there is no meaningful execution without community alignment.

Uniting the community and achieving the Council’s objectives are not separate efforts. They are mutually dependent. An informed, visible, and coordinated community is the foundation for strategic progress. And truly representing that community requires more than symbolic participation - it requires understanding, accountability, and action. The community must be empowered to see itself not only as a stakeholder, but as the very engine of the DAO’s evolution. It’s also about the DAO recognizing what, in my view, it was always meant to be: a structure that serves the community, that empowers the community to organize itself.

That’s how it should have been from the beginning - and now we have a real chance to make it happen.

To support this, I believe that community management must become a core strategy - not a support function. If we want real alignment between users and governance, we need clear processes that make the DAO accessible, visible, and responsive.

This calls for a coordinated approach across four closely linked areas: internal organization, community building, social media communication, and strategic planning for public engagement. These functions are not only interconnected - they benefit from being managed as one cohesive workflow. When executed from a single strategic perspective, they reduce complexity, increase clarity, and keep the DAO agile, focused, and able to respond quickly.


What follows is the starting point of a communication framework that, in my view, defines how the DAO could approach internal alignment, community engagement, and external clarity.
It unites internal organization, community building, social media, and strategic outreach into one streamlined workflow - built to reduce friction, speed up execution, maximize resource efficiency, and center the community at every step, all while aligning with the DAO’s 18-Month Objectives.

Much of this could be achieved through a single strategic role within the Executive Director’s team. Making it not only impactful but also operationally efficient, as it can be fully managed and executed by one person. In the following, I’d like to outline how such a structure could look in practice.

Strategic Communication Framework Rooted in the World it Serves

To support both user engagement and creator empowerment, the DAO must become more accessible, transparent, and responsive - not only in structure, but in everyday communication. In my view, this begins with how the DAO shows up where its users already are: on social media and in-world.

A consistent, community-centered presence on X (Twitter) can serve as a high-impact, low-barrier gateway into DAO activity. The goal is not visibility for its own sake, but to re-activate the community - to spark participation and enable users to stay informed, ask questions, and feel connected to governance.

Content should be regular, accessible, and value-driven - including updates on proposals, forum activity, governance outcomes, in-world events, Town Hall summaries, and voting windows.

The following example illustrates how this kind of communication can take shape in practice, using a real moment within the community to show what responsive, meaningful content might look like.

Responsive Social Media Communication - Creating Value from Community Signals

In addition to structured updates, the DAO’s presence on X should also start acting organic - shaped by what’s actively unfolding within the community. One recent example was the increase in POI removals. While the process itself followed existing mechanisms, it sparked a range of responses, including questions, concerns, and broader reflections about what POIs represent.

Rather than staying silent, this could have been an opportunity to inform and engage:

  • A brief explainer on what POIs are and how the process works
  • A call for feedback on whether the current POI criteria reflect the values of today’s Decentraland
  • A space for moderated discussion or reflection - either in post comments or in-world follow-ups

This type of content doesn’t need to be long or polished. It needs to be timely, useful, and grounded in the questions the community is already asking. When the DAO listens and responds with clarity, communication becomes a service - not just a channel. While the initial focus should remain on X and in-world activations, a broader multi-platform strategy can evolve over time.


While social media helps inform, in-world communication helps connect. Decentraland is not just a platform to talk about - it’s a space to show up in.


In-World Podcast Recording

A bi-weekly podcast, recorded live in-world and published on YouTube, offers short, accessible recaps of DAO activity over the past two weeks. Each episode summarizes key developments, highlights upcoming proposals, and addresses questions submitted by the community.

This creates a clear information loop:

questions → answers → understanding → trust.

Questions can be submitted exclusively during the live in-world recording. They are then addressed in the next episode, establishing a transparent and consistent communication cycle.

DAO Lounge - In-World Presence

As a complementary initiative, the DAO Lounge is a weekly in-world drop-in session, hosted for one to two hours. Each session brings together a rotating member of the Council, Executive Branch, or ED - alongside the person responsible for managing the DAO’s communication formats, such as podcast production and content coordination.

This setup provides consistency and structure while reducing the operational burden for DAO leadership. It allows Council and Executive members to fully focus on dialogue with the community, while facilitation, documentation, and follow-up are handled within an integrated communication workflow.

DAO Co-Creation Lab - In-World Project Incubator

To support community-led initiatives, I propose a monthly in-world incubator where participants can share ideas, find collaborators, and receive structured guidance from a consistent DAO facilitator. A space where community members can develop ideas, connect with collaborators, and receive hands-on support. The format includes project sharing, light facilitation, and practical guidance on resources.

To enrich the experience, invited guests - such as creators or past grantees - could share insights and lessons learned. Their stories offer inspiration and highlight what’s possible when community and DAO structures work together.

The Co-Creation Lab acts as a launchpad for action - turning ideas into aligned initiatives with the DAO as an active enabler.

Community Advisory Groups - Expertise from Within

To strengthen the DAO’s connection to its community, it could be valuable to explore the creation of voluntary Community Advisory Groups.
Participants, such as builders, musicians, event organizers, streamers, wearable creators, and everyday users, could join groups aligned with their expertise and make themselves available for consultation when relevant topics arise.

As recognition, participants could receive an in-world badge highlighting their role as trusted advisors. Over time, lightweight compensation models could be explored, but the immediate goal is to visibly value community insight and integrate it meaningfully into DAO decision-making.

Beyond strengthening community ties, Community Advisory Groups would give the Council, the Executive Director, and the Executive Branch a fast, structured way to access real user insight, keeping decisions grounded, initiatives relevant, and the DAO’s leadership connected to the people it represents.


Integrated Workflow

To ensure communication stays grounded in real context and aligned across teams, I propose a tightly integrated workflow that enables the initiatives outlined above. For formats like the in-world podcast, the DAO Lounge, the Co-Creation Lab, the Community Advisory Groups - and the DAO’s presence on social media - to function effectively, they must be supported by a consistent process: one that connects governance participation, structured documentation, and coordinated content delivery across channels.

  • Regular attendance at DAO Council and Executive meetings

  • Hosting weekly in-world Office Hours with rotating DAO leadership

  • Production of internal notes and public summaries

  • Transformation of key insights into content assets

  • Coordination across teams to maintain message consistency

This framework turns communication from a passive layer into an operational asset. One that enhances internal coordination, provides the community with touchpoints that matter, and reinforces the DAO’s commitment to openness and participation. To illustrate why such a framework is essential, I’d like to present a recent example. One in which proactive communication planning could have helped identify concerns earlier and reduced potential risks.


Case Reflection: The Appointment of the Executive Director

Situation:
The appointment of the Executive Director by the DAO Council marked a major milestone in the DAO’s structural transformation. However, the process lacked public visibility. There was no prior announcement that the Council had reached the stage of choosing a candidate, no open call for applicants, and no proactive explanation of what the Executive Director’s role would entail. When the appointment was finalized, the community was simply presented with the outcome.

Resulting Problem:
This absence of communication created a transparency gap at a critical moment. Given the sensitivity and importance of appointing the first Executive Director, the lack of proactive communication opened the door to speculation, frustration, and uncertainty.

Without clear updates or an open dialogue with the community, the process felt closed and inaccessible - weakening trust at a time when building it should have been a top priority.

Instead of reinforcing confidence in the new structure, the way the appointment was handled reignited concerns about centralization, favoritism, and decision-making without community visibility.

How It Could Have Been Avoided:
If a communication framework, like proposed in this document, had been in place, several issues could have been prevented:

  • Expectation management: A simple announcement - that the Council had entered the Executive Director selection phase - would have prepared the community for what was coming.

  • Contextual education: A short, accessible explainer on what the Executive Director does, how the role connects to the DAO’s goals, and what the selection criteria were, could have turned confusion into understanding.

  • DAO visibility: Using social media channels and in-world formats to share updates, hold a short Q&A would have brought the process closer to the people it affects.

  • Human connection: Introducing the selected candidate properly in-world - with a clear vision statement and open introduction to the community - would have strengthened legitimacy and fostered connection.

Conclusion:
Moments of structural change require more than operational execution - they require trust. And trust doesn’t just come from decisions themselves, but from how those decisions are communicated. A strategic communication system rooted in transparency, accessibility, and active presence could have turned this moment into an opportunity to unify and engage the community - instead of leaving many of its members behind.


Alignment with DAO Objectives

This framework supports two of the DAO’s key focus areas as outlined in the Decentraland DAO Executive Arm: 18-Month Objectives & Key Focus Areas:

  • Engaging Experiences for Users - by lowering participation barriers, improving discoverability, and creating spaces for live conversation.

  • Creators & Builders Growth - by ensuring timely, accessible information about programs, incentives, and governance reaches the right contributors at the right time.


Closing Thought

Why am I writing all this?

Because I want to show that there are ways that are cost-effective, easy and fast to implement - ways that can close the gaps between leadership and community, rebuild trust where it has been strained, and finally turn transparency and participation into lived realities, not just promises. In my view, after the restructuring, it is even more critical than before that those responsible within the DAO proactively engage with the community.

The DAO doesn’t need more good intentions. It needs clarity. It needs structure. And it needs communication that doesn’t just react or ignores but leads.

We have an opportunity - right now - to build something better. A DAO that grows alongside its community, listens openly, and leads with transparency and care. The DAO should be the beating heart of Decentraland. That’s the kind of DAO I want to help build. I’m ready to step up, take responsibility, and actively contribute.

Right now, the community still doesn’t know what the Executive Director’s team will look like. How it will be assembled, which positions will be filled, whether the selection process has already started, what the budget is or what it will entail. And while I appreciate that there are opportunities for 1:1 conversations to discuss these kinds of topics, I believe these discussions should happen publicly. Here, where everyone can see and participate.

I’m writing this because I want to show initiative. This post can be considered my application for a place within the Executive Director’s team.

I want to be part of the internal process to help our DAO become what, in my view, it was always meant to be: a structure that strengthens, empowers, and truly represents the interests of its community - no matter how small this community may seem today.


13 Likes

Tagging ED and DAO Council here - mainly to ensure they’ve had a chance to see this, and in case they’d like to share any thoughts or have questions.

@Agus @Canessa @Fehz @ginoct @maraoz @MetaRyuk

3 Likes

Couldn’t agree more—this has been weighing on my mind for a while now.
When I think about the long-term sustainability of the platform, a dedicated function for clear, consistent communication and community coordination feels absolutely essential.

To me, a strategic communications role within the DAO isn’t just a ‘nice to have’—it’s a foundational need. The ideas shared here point toward a more aligned and informed community, and I think filling this gap would add huge value.

2 Likes

Your thoughts are exactly what the DAO needs right now. Without open comms, transparency, and community feedback, the new structure is just window dressing. Crazy that someone offering real, practical fixes isn’t on the Council yet, hope Gino gets you on board soon.

1 Like

“This post can be considered my application for a place within the Executive Director’s team.”

Hi Toxic,
I saw your post but do not feel that it is appropriate for me to give input on something you are considering to be an application to the Executive Director’s team. The hiring process is the responsibility of the Executive Director, not the Council. It would be unfair and unethical to all members of the community if I start weighing in on posts like this that are considered job applications with personal gain attached. I do not want to begin blurring the lines between the Council and the Executive Director. The most equitable action I can do is observe quietly and allow Gino to choose his team accordingly.

Thank you.

3 Likes

Hi @Canessa,

thank you so much for your response! I apologize if tagging you, the Council, and the Executive Director made you feel compelled to reply to my post, even though you view that as inappropriate and potentially unethical. I genuinely wasn’t aware that this could put you in such a position, and I absolutely didn’t mean to cause that. I really appreciate that you took the time to respond anyway.

I fully respect your wish to keep the line between Council and Executive Director roles clear. I thought my post might still be relevant for you and the Council, because in the Proposal for Establishing a Council for Decentraland DAO, under Responsibilities of the Council, point 4 (Drafting Strategic Guidelines and Overseeing Executive Arm Formation), it states:

“Also, if the proposal for creating an Executive Arm passes, the Council will initiate a recruitment process to hire an Executive Director and build the team, adhering to the DAO’s principles of transparency and accountability. These guidelines will serve as a roadmap for the Council and Executive Arm, ensuring alignment with the community’s vision and enabling feedback before formalizing the strategy.”

That’s why I assumed it would be appropriate to ask for your input.

Of course, I respect your decision to observe quietly, especially since I used the post to formally express my interest in being part of the team - even if I don’t yet know what this team will look like or how it will be compensated.

Still, I would have really appreciated your thoughts on my ideas for the proposed initiatives to involve the community more deeply in the DAO. I truly value your expertise as a community leader, and I wanted to open a constructive dialogue around what meaningful participation could look like for all of us.

Thank you again for taking the time to respond!

Best,
Toxic

Thank you - I really appreciate that!

At the end of the day, ideas only matter if they translate into systems people can trust and use. That’s what I’m trying to contribute to.

Really appreciate your thoughtful response!
You summed it up perfectly - this isn’t a side function, it’s foundational. I’m glad the intention behind the proposal came through clearly, and I’m hopeful we can start treating communication as core DAO infrastructure moving forward.

Hello Toxic,
Of course it would be just the right thing to do. We need transparency because this is not a game, people invest their money, their time, put efforts, and are involved in this platform for years now. I will not go into much politics because I do not have all the cards on hand to formulate strong statements yet, however here is my stand, which is shared by some users:

No more Web2 social media mentality…like/suscribe/retweet…we do not need that.

How can we promote DCL as a Web3 platform, as “the next thing”, if all there is, are more social media engagements (Web2) than actual presence and interactions in DCL (Web3)? It is counterintuitive isn’t it?

People want to stream, want to chat, want to host giveaway? Please friends, do it in DCL, on your scene, make little fun posters to advertise in DCL, have regular presence on your scene, let people know within Decentraland’s boards, that you are there to host this or that. We want to know our friends host great events, are building wonders, when we log in DCL, not by going on X or certain parts of Discord and so on.

I admit it is fun to post photos of Decentraland on social media, it touches me to read things here and there, but we should have all of this in-house, we should have the possibility to check the fun photos taken by friends, on scenes (maybe just a scene entirely dedicated to fun posts?) all within Decentraland itself…I know people may disagree with that view, but people have to ask themselves those questions: Why am I in Decentraland for? As a user, what made me join this platform? Some of us want to be that change we want to see, and we are working toward this opportunity to make a difference, by having a regular presence, by building step by step and shaping our vision.

I resume, one word: Web3

Tox and MGD, you know I will genuinely always support you, your fun creations etc. They make us laugh, they make us feel in awe to the ingenuity of such implementations. Just a little disagreement about social media, but for the rest, yes! :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Thank you, @toxicwaifu, for taking the time to write this post. Thoughtful, detailed, and respectful contributions like yours are critical to elevating the discourse in our community and shaping the future of the DAO :purple_heart:

I agree that fostering a strong community and establishing clear communication flows are key to building the legitimacy of this new organizational chapter. I also agree that the process for selecting the Executive Director could have been more transparent. While I believe the DAO Council acted in good faith—prioritizing pragmatism and trying not to introduce unnecessary workload or bureaucracy—the lack of step-by-step communication may have unintentionally created a sense of opacity. It’s a valuable lesson, and I take it seriously.

Since being appointed, I’ve been focused on two immediate priorities: developing a budget and translating the DAO Council’s proposed objectives into executable initiatives. Next week, we will host an AMA session to answer community questions, and I’ll be sharing my first monthly update soon.

As for the hiring process: it hasn’t started yet, as we are still in the process of budget approval and allocation. Once we’re ready to proceed, all open positions will be published publicly so that anyone interested can apply. Transparency and openness will be foundational to how we build this team.

I’d also like to share the guiding principles I’ve drafted for the Executive Arm. These are meant to serve as a north star for our work, and I believe they align closely with the vision you outlined in your post:


Executive Arm Guiding Principles

We are Mission Obsessed: The first step to kickstart a project should be to test if it’s aligned with the project’s vision and the DAO’s mission. The Executive Arm serves as an enabler, ensuring the DAO’s resources drive meaningful impact.

Work in the Open, Engage Often: Transparency is not optional. Reporting back to the community is a core responsibility, not a side quest.

We Test, Measure, and Decide: We ship small, test early, and measure impact. If something works, we scale it. If it doesn’t, we iterate or move on.

Ecosystem First, Excellence Always: We prioritize working with Decentraland community members, builders, and contributors if they can deliver high-quality and cost-effective projects. But when necessary, we stay open to external talent to ensure the best possible outcomes.


While I support the idea that our conversations should happen in public as much as possible, I also want to offer the option to book a 1:1 session with me via my Calendly. Unlike Council members, whose role is part-time, I am dedicating the majority of my time and attention to this work.

Lastly, thank you again for your application and for raising your hand to contribute. In my proposal to the DAO Council, there is a budget allocated for a DAO Lead role (building on the great work previously done by the Facilitation Squad, but with expanded scope) as well as a Marketing Specialist. I’m currently working on a full hiring plan, and once we’re ready to move forward, you’ll have the opportunity to apply for those or other relevant positions.

I ask only for a bit of patience as I work to set the foundation that will allow us to execute effectively and transparently moving forward.

Looking forward to continuing this conversation!

8 Likes

@toxicwaifu
Thanks for your post. I really appreciate the honesty and agree with many of the points you raise.

Since the new Council started in Jan 2025, we’ve been working exactly on (as you well say) going from silence to structure. We defined a Council Charter, hired Gino as Executive Director, approved the executive plan and budget, pushed the OpCo proposal forward, devised an internal process to deal with community feedback (like yours), and opened a public thread to share updates. It’s been a lot of groundwork, but I also understand it’s not enough yet.

The expectations from the community are high (rightfully so), and we need to step up on clarity and responsiveness. That’s a big focus for us moving forward and once the Executive Branch is up and running (which you may end up being a part of, haha).

Thanks again for holding us to a higher standard. Keep it coming, and hope you can continue helping the Council, Executive Branch, and DAO.

5 Likes

Hey @Kairos!

First of all – thank you so much for taking the time to respond with such honesty and depth. I genuinely appreciate it, especially because your message touches on something that clearly matters to a lot of people in Decentraland. It’s exactly these kinds of conversations that can move us forward.

I totally get your concerns about social media – especially if we think of it in the classic Web2 sense: likes, retweets, empty engagement. But that’s actually what I want to move away from.

Personally, I see social media as a bridge between my offline life and Decentraland – a space where both worlds connect and feed into each other. But that’s just my personal take!

From a strategic marketing perspective, I believe that if we want more people to engage with the DAO, we also need entry points outside of DCL – spaces that invite, inform, and activate. Visibility sparks curiosity – not only for the DAO, but for DCL as a whole – and curiosity brings presence. The goal isn’t to replicate what the Foundation is doing, but to complement it. That’s the idea.

Here I see social media as part of the DAOs outreach layer and transparency layer – not to replace what happens in-world, but to document it, support it, and guide more people toward it. It’s about opening doors, not creating distractions.

The idea of giving more space to community expression within Decentraland really resonates with me! A place where people can discover what others are building, sharing, or celebrating – not outside, but right here in-world – that’s a direction I’d love to see grow. Maybe it’s a scene, maybe it’s a new kind of board or mechanic – either way, it opens the door to something meaningful.

Thanks again for your thoughtful words and for your support. Even if we don’t fully agree on every detail, I feel like we’re absolutely aligned on the bigger picture: building a vibrant, creative, self-determined community and in-world should always come first – it’s the heartbeat.

Everything else should follow its rhythm.:folded_hands:

1 Like

Thank you Tox, I appreciate the lecture of your comment, and to see your passion in it. I now understand your point: to use social media as a bridge rather than as a distraction…I suppose that is the way to help open doors to Decentraland.

I like the way you describe it, your approach is thoughtful, and we clearly see your deep love for this community. And yes, I’m 100% with you on making more space for community expression in-world, simply because that’s where we are.

Thanks again for everything you do. I’m excited to keep building alongside people like you :slight_smile:

1 Like

Hello @ginoct,

thanks for your clear and open response! :sparkles:

The way you engaged with the points I raised reflects the kind of structural conversation I was hoping to start – focused on how we can improve our DAO in the future. I believe this kind of exchange – open, structured, and public – is essential if we want to grow into the kind of DAO that truly represents its community, and I value the way you chose to engage in it.

It’s good to see that transparency and accountability are a core part of the guiding principles. I’m looking forward to the AMA and the upcoming monthly updates – these are the kind of steps we need to build rhythm and trust over time.

The roles you mentioned sound really interesting and align with the kind of contribution I’d like to make. At the time I wrote my post, I didn’t have information on how far along the hiring process was – but I wanted to express my interest early and, more importantly, offer input while the structure was still forming. I’m glad the timing aligned and that I was able to share ideas before everything was finalized.

Thanks for the work you’re putting into building this on solid ground. I’ll be following the public updates closely, and while I may take you up on the 1:1 offer at some point, I value that we were able to start this conversation here in public – where others can still engage with it, too.

I’m looking forward to what’s next – and to staying engaged as it takes shape!

3 Likes

Hi @maraoz!

Thanks for jumping in and taking the time to share your thoughts – and for giving us more insight into what’s been happening in the Council!

While I see the Council’s efforts, some of them haven’t been easy to follow, so I appreciate you stepping up and helping to make them more visible here. Structures like the public thread are a great start, but they need to be backed by regular presence to keep people engaged – and maybe even offer users the chance to post questions directly in that thread. I know it takes time to find a rhythm and establish a consistent communication flow, but I believe conversations like this help us get there.

And for whatever’s next with the Executive Branch – I’m here for it. :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

Today, I’m just glad we’re having this public conversations, where everyone can follow along and contribute.

Let’s keep it going.

2 Likes