Hi @Existential14, thanks for the detailed questions, and sorry for taking this long to get back to you in writing. I covered parts of this at the September and October Townhalls, so here is all of it in one place, with links you can check.
1. Where the mission is published, and who was responsible
It is now published in:
2. Roles of the Foundation, the DAO and the governance bodies
Same page, under “Who does what”. It covers the DAO, the DAO Council, DCL Regenesis Labs, the Foundation, the Security Advisory Board and the Wearables Curation Committee, with what each one is responsible for and what it is not. It also lists every DAO multisig with its signers and threshold. RGL wrote it and keeps it up to date (it has a changelog). If something there is wrong, report it and we’ll fix it.
3. POI at -91,75
There is no transaction hash, because the on-chain change was never made. The proposal passed on March 25. On April 8 it was marked as enacted in the Governance dApp from a DAO Committee account, without an enacting transaction. The coordinate is not in the on-chain POI list today (you can check it here), which is why the client doesn’t show it.
As discussed at the September Townhall, the on-chain update was stuck with the former DAO Committee multisig. Since October 4, that multisig (now the DAO Operational Multisig) is controlled by the five signers designated by the DAO Council (details), so it can be executed now. This is on the Council now.
4. Who operates what
Two separate things here. What users own (LAND, Estates, NAMEs, Wearables) are NFTs in their wallets, and the critical contracts belong to the DAO. Upgrades to the LAND and Estate contracts need a Security Advisory Board vote with at least three of five in favor and none against. That is what the docs mean when they say no single company can take your space or identity away.
Running the services is a different question. The roles page now covers it at the organization level: the Foundation maintains the desktop client and the critical infrastructure services (decentraland.org, the Marketplace app, the docs) and holds the IP, domains, repositories and social accounts. RGL maintains the Governance dApp and the transparency tooling. Since the handover, the official Discord is administered by the Foundation, and the DAO Discord and X by the Council.
Publishing the detail you are asking for (for each production service, who operates it, who holds admin access, and who could restore it without help) would be exposing a super sensitive surface area to the broader public. Personally, I would advise against doing that, especially in these times.
Thanks for keep pushing on these. Most of what changed in the docs this month started with your questions.