The creation of this committee is a long process, whose ultimate goal is the decentralization of decisions.
Until today, the path was this:
- Poll to see how grants should be revoked (Approved)
- Draft to create a new revocations committee that included the proposal of members (rejected, the community requested that should be 2 different processes).
- Draft + Governance validating the creation of the new committee and the process of choosing its members that we are following here (approved)
- Members Open Call
- Poll to define the name of the committee
- Poll to define the members (this is the one that is being voted here).
We are following the procedure that the community approved. Remember that this election of members is to give the formal start to the committee, and that it lasts for 1 year so the members of the committee can be modified later.
If the community thinks it should be different, we can ask the Facilitation Squad to set up a process similar to the one for the election of the new member of the DAO Committee.
However, our point of view is that the faster the committee is active, the closer we will be to decentralization. Considering that the people voted in here will have responsibility for only 12 months, and considering that the grant program is about to restart, I would not hesitate to take the step to make the first committee effective.
Thanks for your inputs