by 0x858343382132b9ab46c857a7d52fdbafc039f784 (Zino)
After a nurturing discussion on the previous poll about the procedure to revoke a grant, the community saw it necessary to split the poll into two separate questions:
-
1 Who should make the decision of revoking grants?
One of the goals of our program is signaling to the DAO if a vesting contract needs to be revoked. Actually, when the grantee does not comply with the basic terms and conditions of the Grants program, it is defined that the grant must be revoked but not who should do it.After this decision is made, we will establish and document the procedure for revoking grants, making this publicly available for the community to have clarity on how we are moving forward.
-
2. We will review the practices that raised concerns based on the input given by the community, and seize the opportunity to reexamine Grantās terms and conditions.
So, the question still remains:
Who should make the decision of revoking grants?
-
Community Decides: The Grant Support Squad presents each case with our arguments and recommendations to the Community and asks if the Grant should be revoked.
-
DAO committee decides: The Grant Support Squad presents each case with our arguments and recommendations to the DAO Committee to decide if the grant should be revoked.
-
New committee decides: The Grant Support Squad presents each case with our arguments and recommendations and assigns the responsibility to decide to a NEW Committee, which specifically addresses these matters.
-
Random, rotative and voluntary Jury decides: The Grant Support Squad presents each case with our arguments and recommendations, for a Jury to decide if the grant should be revoked.
-
Do nothing.
Weād love to hear your opinion regarding the decision making. Let us know in the comments and weād be happy to discuss them in more detail.
- Community Decides
- DAO committee decides
- New committee decides
- Jury
- Do nothing
- Invalid question/options