[DAO:9a01bce] Deprecation of the current Grants program and Bidding and Tendering process

by 0x858343382132b9ab46c857a7d52fdbafc039f784 (Zino)

Linked Pre-Proposal

Should we restructure the way our DAO operates?

Summary

This proposal aims to deprecate the existing Grants Program and Bidding and Tendering process in favor of a more strategically aligned and efficient way of managing and allocating DAO funds

Abstract

According to the following discussions we had at the DCL DAO: Regenesis Summit Summary, the result of the kickstart governance process, and the feedback gathered on the RFC - “Deprecation of the Current Decentraland DAO Grants program and Bidding and Tendering process” Draft Proposal, this proposal calls for the deprecation of the current Grants Program and Bidding and Tendering process within the Decentraland DAO to create a more effective, strategically aligned funding model.

Upon approval, both programs will be frozen, with no new proposals accepted. Active projects will continue under the supervision of the Grant Support Squad, and the Revocations Committee will be dissolved. Historical data on funding will remain accessible.

Deprecating these programs is critical for addressing inefficiencies and ensuring future funding aligns with Decentraland’s long-term vision. A concurrent proposal for a new funding model is also under consideration, aimed at enhancing transparency and resource allocation.

Motivation

Despite allowing direct community-driven funding decisions for the past four years, these programs have faced several key issues, including vote influencing based on personal connections, community tension over securing votes, and inefficiencies in proposal submissions. Many funded projects have failed to meet expectations, leading to resource misallocation and grant revocations, while the programs lack alignment with Decentraland’s long-term goals:

  • Vote Influencing: Participants often lobby for votes based on personal connections rather than project merit, undermining the objectivity of the funding process.

  • Community Tension: The pressure to secure votes has created tension within the community, shifting focus from evaluating projects to garnering support, which compromises fairness and transparency.

  • Inefficiencies in Proposal Submission: Rejected applicants must restart the process, causing delays and discouraging project creators, which slows ecosystem growth.

- Resource Misallocation: A significant portion of funded projects have not met expectations, resulting in wasted resources and grant revocations.

- Lack of Strategic Alignment: The current program does not prioritize advancing Decentraland’s long-term goals, leading to the approval of projects that do not contribute meaningfully to ecosystem growth.
To ensure more effective use of the DAO’s treasury and support Decentraland’s strategic vision, a new funding model is required, and these programs should be deprecated.

Specification

Deprecation of the Current Grants program and Tender process:

  • Effective immediately upon approval, both the current Grants Program and the Bidding & Tendering process will be frozen. No new Grant, Pitch, Tender, or Bid proposals will be accepted, and no budget will be allocated.

  • Active projects (with an active Vesting Contract) will continue and will be supervised by the Grant Support Squad (GSS), and the Revocations Committee will act if it´s needed.

  • The Revocations Committee will be dissolved as its role in accountability becomes unnecessary without this program.

  • The Projects Dashboard will still be available on the Governance dApp and the historical information on funds allocation will still be available on the Transparency stack of the DAO.

Conclusion

Deprecating the current Grants Program and Bidding and Tendering process is vital to eliminating inefficiencies and aligning funding with Decentraland’s strategic vision. This move will stop the resource drain and pave the way for a more transparent, fair, and strategically focused funding model.

Vote on this proposal on the Decentraland DAO

View this proposal on Snapshot

I agree with the deprecation…
But can we elaborate on how the future grants program will work?
(How will community members get paid efficiently in the future?)

Yes! that´s the idea!

Tier system!
With someone leading the decision making and the tier 1s deciding who can execute that task amongst the community…

Deprecation of the current Grants program and Bidding and Tendering process

This proposal is now in status: REJECTED.

Voting Results:

  • Yes 32% 540,742 VP (15 votes)
  • No 17% 285,729 VP (7 votes)
  • Abstain 51% 812,884 VP (12 votes)

Deprecation of the current Grants program and Bidding and Tendering process

This proposal is now in status: PASSED.

Voting Results:

  • Yes 71% 2,540,742 VP (16 votes)
  • No 7% 285,729 VP (7 votes)
  • Abstain 22% 812,884 VP (12 votes)

This aint gonna help the conspiracy theories

Yaaa… someone explain this…

Can someone explain that voting discrepancy?

I don’t know what happened with the Governance page, but what happened in snapshots is what matters: Snapshot (you can download the csv with each vote). I guess there was an issue while processing the snapshot data, and they got wrong info and then Governance people fixed it.

1 Like

@BET @jar0d @web3nit @Vaporizador When the proposal ended, Snapshot API was down and returned an outdated count on the vote calculation. That’s why there was a discrepancy between our front end and the final Snapshot result. As Lean said, Snapshot is the source of truth in terms of outcomes, our team just ran the calculation again when we detected the error. You can check the Snapshot proposal here: Snapshot
If you don’t trust my response, please reach out to the Snapshot team, there is no way a voting period can be extended or votes can be changed on their end!

1 Like

Oh, I didn’t think anything actually nefarious had occurred. I just know that that community is looking for any reason it can find to be upset about “centraland” and the coming changes. Which for the record, I think are all for the best or at the very least being attempted in good faith by people who have nothing but good intentions.

But most people would rather assume a secret cabal is attempting to cheat than to make the logical assumption that Snapshot or the Reporting bot had an easily explained bug.

Sorry if my first post did not make that clear.

If building in web3 was easy Apple and Microsoft would already be here centralizing everything anyway :smiley: