The changes are not that big compared to current standards, maybe this graph illustrates it better.
There is just one big argument, MANA is a volatile asset.
For short projects this might not be an issue, and that’s why the lower tiers now enables payments in MANA for up to $20,000 worth of USD. However, for long projects is fundamental to secure a budget in USD in order to honor commitments made with contractors and third parties.
I like the idea to incentivize the request for grants in MANA, but I would keep it simple for this iteration.
There are 31 proposals that passed with more than 10M VP.
There are 117 proposals that passed with more than 4M VP.
For the other two points, I invite you to do your own research using the transparency data sheet, or the CSV exported by the transparency OS.
The proposal was opened for public comment in the forum first and later discussed here. I’m glad for all the contributions received and the signaling looks favorable. I’ll move it to a Governance Proposal.