# \[DAO:c50eacc\] Should DAX be confirmed as part of the Revocations Committee? **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance\ **Created:** [March 28, 2023, 2:39pm UTC](https://forum.decentraland.org/t/dao-c50eacc-should-dax-be-confirmed-as-part-of-the-revocations-committee/18734 "2023-03-28T14:39:54Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 5\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![dao](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.decentraland.org/dao/32/386_2.png) [@dao](https://forum.decentraland.org/u/dao)\ **Post date:** [March 28, 2023, 2:39pm UTC](https://forum.decentraland.org/t/dao-c50eacc-should-dax-be-confirmed-as-part-of-the-revocations-committee/18734/1 "2023-03-28T14:39:54Z")
> by 0x858343382132b9ab46c857a7d52fdbafc039f784 (Zino) This poll continues the Formal Process of creating the Accountability Committee to elect a Committee Member from the seven (7) selected Revocation Committee Applicants. The DAO needs to appoint one (1) member to the Revocations Committee in order to reach the initial setup of five (5) members and two (2) substitutes. In accordance with the process established to create the Accountability Committee, an Open Call for Candidates was published. The Open Call received twelve (12) submissions. Seven (7) were pre-selected by the Grant Support Squad members, following an interview process and ranking of the candidates using a system based on trust, professional background, Technical Knowledge, and DAO Participation. After that, the Facilitation Squad hosted an [open session](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzTUBjDI9xI) where the selected candidates were introduced and responded to a Q&A session with the community. The selected candidates who could not attend the live session answered asynchronously in the [dedicated Discord channel](https://discord.com/channels/894658869391933540/1080892168245358722/1087474954230059029) This is the final [stage](https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=19c0e070-bc5b-11ed-8c13-518b5c1940be) to vote for a member, following the DAO Committee´s procedure. This selection will be followed by a Draft Proposal to confirm the selected list of committee members when approved and a Binding Governance Proposal to ratify the decision and formally appoint the Member-Selection to the Revocations Committee. Following this procedure, and at the third stage of article three of the proposed framework selected by the community, plus the way defined to vote by the Community, now it is up to the community to confirm that this selection is a good fit. Here are some relevant about why the member was selected: _Dax:_ Experience in Decentraland as a land owner since the genesis auction in 2017, an active and trusted community member, technical expertise, experience being a grantee leading DCL Metrics. Check out the application [here](https://forum.decentraland.org/t/open-call-for-accountability-committee-members/17546/2) - YES - NO - Invalid question/options **[Vote on this proposal on the Decentraland DAO](https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=63f77470-cd76-11ed-8b08-0d4504ab75fe)** **[View this proposal on Snapshot](https://snapshot.org/#/snapshot.dcl.eth/proposal/0xde58774285933e124c017337fcecbe015d5d3c7a202e26b32dbb51424c50eacc)** ---
**Author:** ![web3nit](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.decentraland.org/web3nit/32/27357_2.png) [@web3nit](https://forum.decentraland.org/u/web3nit)\ **Post date:** [March 28, 2023, 3:04pm UTC](https://forum.decentraland.org/t/dao-c50eacc-should-dax-be-confirmed-as-part-of-the-revocations-committee/18734/3 "2023-03-28T15:04:40Z")
Dax imo, has strong track record of using rational and logical thinking to analyze complex issues and arrive at well-informed decisions. ---
**Author:** ![LF\_1](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.decentraland.org/lf_1/32/25661_2.png) [@LF\_1](https://forum.decentraland.org/u/LF_1)\ **Post date:** [March 28, 2023, 7:19pm UTC](https://forum.decentraland.org/t/dao-c50eacc-should-dax-be-confirmed-as-part-of-the-revocations-committee/18734/4 "2023-03-28T19:19:09Z")
Don´t know it well, but I support him ---
**Author:** ![dao](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.decentraland.org/dao/32/386_2.png) [@dao](https://forum.decentraland.org/u/dao)\ **Post date:** [April 2, 2023, 2:39pm UTC](https://forum.decentraland.org/t/dao-c50eacc-should-dax-be-confirmed-as-part-of-the-revocations-committee/18734/5 "2023-04-02T14:39:00Z")
Should DAX be confirmed as part of the Revocations Committee? This proposal is now in status: FINISHED. Voting Results: - Yes 99% 4,293,776 VP (100 votes) - No 1% 3 VP (1 votes) - Invalid question/options 0% 0 VP (0 votes) ---
**Author:** ![dao](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.decentraland.org/dao/32/386_2.png) [@dao](https://forum.decentraland.org/u/dao)\ **Post date:** [April 3, 2023, 3:58pm UTC](https://forum.decentraland.org/t/dao-c50eacc-should-dax-be-confirmed-as-part-of-the-revocations-committee/18734/6 "2023-04-03T15:58:22Z")
Should DAX be confirmed as part of the Revocations Committee? This proposal has been PASSED by a DAO Committee Member (0xbfa6d24e6a061e9aea3447163fdfe045177dd40e)